Talk:Lean in Project Management

From apppm
Revision as of 17:49, 22 September 2015 by S141569 (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Mette: I like the idea and the topic you have chosen. Lean contains many tools, so you could maybe consider if you should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only looking at one tool.

Feedback

s141569 – Review to article “Lean in Project Management”

Modification done at 18:00

I find the article really interesting because it is referring in something that I did not really know about. It is a good chance to read something about lean and how it is used in project management and moreover in a company like Toyota.

I would suggest to the author to add some more examples to be more visible the way of using it. Moreover, it is not clear if the implementation is the same with the application. I would recommend to avoid unnecessary information because the article is going to be very long and hard to be read.

  • The article in general is free of errors except few syntax errors in some sentences.
  • It is written in an engaging style because I did not know a lot about this topic, so it attracted me to read it.
  • The structure is very good in small and understandable sentences.
  • The figures are not so many but they are clear, they are referred in the text and finally they are helpful in the section that they have been put. There is no reference if they are borrowed from somewhere (copyright)
  • The article is properly formatted but with no hyper-links from Wikipedia. The graphics are used, are the photos that I referred above. There is no video in the article.
  • According to the providing information, I believe that it is very interesting for a practitioner.
  • I think that the article is related to a project, program or portfolio management topic.
  • I think that the article is going to be very long and hard to be read because the length is almost 3.000 words and there are 2 chapters missing until the finish.
  • There is a logical flow among the parts of the article.
  • The starting summary describes what follows on extend.
  • There are both sources and references.
  • The article is based on different kind of resources. All of them I think they are of high quality.
  • There is no link with other relevant pages in apppm wiki.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox