Talk:Key performance indicator (KPI)

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity	Good
Language	OK but remember to correct your misspellings
Description of the tool/theory/concept	Good
Purpose explanation	Good but try to relate it more to project, program or portfolio management
Title of the Wiki	Good
Relevance to curriculum	Make sure to relate KPIs to project, program or portfolio management instead of the organisation in general
References	Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
Other

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Helena Rejndrup

Question 1 · TEXT

Quality of the summary:

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 1

I am not a completely sure of the key focus from this text just yet.

Question 2 · TEXT

Structure and logic of the article:

Is the argument clear?

Is there a logical flow to the article?

Does one part build upon the other?

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 2

So far there is a flow to the article, though the argument isn’t clear just yet. The background builds on the abstract, which is good. I would just suggest some more text about the specific use of KPI’s In project management.

Question 3 · TEXT

Grammar and style:

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 3

The article is written in a very nice and professional language. So far no/few unnecessary fill words.

Question 4 · TEXT

Figures and tables:

Are figures and tables clear?

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 4

There are non yet. It would be nice with some figures

Question 5 · TEXT

Interest and relevance:

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 5

There are examples of the use of KPI, but the article should go deeper into how a project manager can use this.

Question 6 · TEXT

Depth of treatment:

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 6

At the moment the article is very shallow, and undone. But I guess there will be more to the anatomy of KPI + application of KPI (in project management) and limitations of it.

Question 7 · TEXT

Annotated bibliography:

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 7

It's not there yet