Talk:Risk Profile in General Contracting

KB1991, reviewer 2:

• What there is written so far is good.
• Good introduction that describes the topic briefly, but the last part has been written twice.
• The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat.
• Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺

s150905, Review 2:

The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing

• The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work
• The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work

Reviewer 3, 150477

The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m.

• The abstract sounds interesting and your parts constructed in a logical way.
• The last part has been written twice, be careful!
• Relevant topic with Risks in Construction.
• Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-)
• Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly.