Challenges and Execution of Innovation Portfolio Management
Innovation Portfolio Management (IPM) can be described as a system to manage an array of projects that deliver innovation/innovative products to the market.[1] High-tech companies are nowadays faced with a business environment which is characterized by an increasing dynamism and unpredictability. In order to stay competitive it is crucial to develop a suitable and flexible innovation strategy by means of possessing a broad setup of innovation-projects (innovation portfolio) and permanently adjusting this portfolio to the changing environment.[2] Hereby IPM can deliver support as an appropriate tool to implement strategy shifts into all innovation-project activities throughout the organization in a coordinated manner. Main difficulties arising in the IPM process are related to the risk profile of basic innovation ideas, the continued innovation portfolio prioritization and to the dynamic resource allocation.[2]
This article focuses on describing the general structure of an IPM system integrated as a connecting element between qualitative strategy definition and the project-based implementation. The IPM is seperated into a strategic and operational element (Strategic and Operational Portfolio Management).[3] Hereby there are also given tools enabling to tackle the mentioned main challenges of investment risk (staging investment), portfolio prioritization (BCG matrix / McKinsey Matrix / R&D Project Portfolio Matrix)[4] and resource allocation (RCCP and RCPSP scheduling / RCMPSP scheduling / Agile / Critical Chain). The article is concluded with a short future outlook and open research questions.
Introduction Innovoation Portfolio Management (IPM)
Traditionally innovation research was mainly focused on the appropriate management of single new product development (NPD) projects, thus focusing on innovation determinants at the project level.[5] In the face of today's globalization of markets, shorter life-cycles and increasing competition as well as complexity of technologies, high-tech firms have to hold a set of multiple NPD projects (innovation portfolio) to be flexible and reduce the risk to the lowest level possible. Hereby each project generates several changes on its own. This results in a set of cascading effects throughout the rest of the NPD projects, which have to be evaluated in relation to each other.[2] Additionally market changes and new business practices constrain firms to continuously reconsider the corporate competitive strategy, including their innovation portfolio. These two points create a permanently-changing decision context that cannot be conceived with a single-project perspective, but has to be managed with an overall IPM process. The desired outcome of an effective IPM is a stable pipeline of high-quality new products by linking the strategy formulation to the strategy implementation. This finally ensures long-term corporate growth and profitability.[5]
Strategic and Operational Innovation Portfolio Management (SIPM / OIPM)
test atest
References
- ↑ R.C. Ohr, K. McFarthing, Managing Innovation Portfolios - Strategic Portfolio Management, (InnovationManagement.se, 2013), http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2013/10/11/managing-innovation-portfolios-operational-portfolio-management/.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 R. Abrantes, J. Figueiredo, Resource management process framework for dynamic NPD portfolios, International Journal of Project Management, 33 (2015): 1274-1288.
- ↑ R.C. Ohr, K. McFarthing, Managing Innovation Portfolios - Operational Portfolio Management, (InnovationManagement.se, 2013), http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2013/09/16/managing-innovation-portfolios-strategic-portfolio-management/.
- ↑ J.H. Mikkola, Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management, Technovation, 21 (2001): 423-435.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 A. Meifort, Innovation Portfolio Management: A Synthesis and Research Agenda, Creativity and Innovation Management, 25 (2016): 251-296.
