Bubble diagram as visual tool

From apppm
Revision as of 14:20, 13 September 2016 by Marcocarloni (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Abstract

The bubble diagram is a graphing technique used in project portfolio management to making decision, especially to display balance in new product project portfolios. These visual representation is an adaptation of the four quadrant BCG (star; cash cow; dog; wildcat) diagrams developed in 1970 by Bruce D. Handerson as strategy models [1]. The diagram is a variant of the regular x-y plot, where circle or ellipse are used instead the single points, and extra information are provided by varying the shape, the size and the colour. Furthermore the chart can usually be divided in four section to facilitate recognition of different situations. The most popular chart is the risk-reward which shows the probability of success on the vertical axis and the NPV ( Net Present Value) over a period of time on the horizontal axis.[2] The risk-reward portfolio mapping involves keeping the projects into four different categories:

  • Pearls: high probability of success and generate high payoffs
  • Oysters: long shots, but with high payoffs
  • Bread & Butter: low-risk projects with low rewards
  • White Elephants: low probability and low payoff projects

However it is possible to plot other different parameters on these bubble diagrams in order to seek balance:

  • Ease vs attractiveness
  • Strength vs attractiveness
  • Cost vs timing
  • Strategic vs benefit
  • Cost vs benefit

This method is widely used by the companies even if just a small percentage use it as the dominant. This article aspirates to perform an overview of the bubble diagram method and its uses through some practical example and a comparison with different tools as the financial methods, strategic methods and scoring model. [3] Furthermore will be analyzed the advantages and the disadvantages of this method and will be discussed if actually can give a real help to the decision making in Portfolio Management.

References

  1. B.D. Handerson, The Experience Curve - Reviewed IV. The Growth Share Matrix or The Product Portfolio.
  2. R.G. Cooper, S.J. Edgett, E.J. Kleinschmidt, R&D Portfolio Management Best Practices Study, Industrial Research Institute (IRI), Washington, DC., 1997.
  3. R.G. Cooper, S.J. Edgett, E.J. Kleinschmidt, Best practices for managing R&D portfolios, 1998.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox