Talk:Design Thinking
From DTU ProjectLab
Revision as of 22:26, 19 February 2019 by Hani Mike Rae Selim (Talk | contribs)
Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity & language | The text is somewhat coherent, but can be improved. Missing punctuation. Also, I would recommend adding titles (e.g. for the abstract) instead of just bold text. |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | Good. However, the second part of the abstract isn't easy to follow. |
| Article purpose explanation | Well explained. Keep up the good work and make sure to include an explanation of the article purpose. |
| Relevance to curriculum | Relevant. The first part started well, however the second part of the abstract focuses on generic applications rather than project/program/portfolio management. Make sure to keep within the realms of project/program/portfolio management. |
| References | Try to use the list of references (if it makes sense). |
