Search results

... should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only ...os here and there, but there is a full week to correct that :-) In my eyes it gives a very good overview, which is really good. Alternatively you could h

...to discuss the different that separates this tool from other tools and why it is a good thing. ...ons and fine-tuning, i.e. how to place your pictures in the right place so it don’t overlap to other sections, or that all the points in “Estimating

...f you describe how the duration of the tasks are defined. At least include it before you suggest to optimize by adding resources in section “Control of ...better. The pace/tact are (often) determined quantitatively where with CPM it is often qualitatively. With LBS the schedule is based on actual numbers an

...ybe you should consider to just focus on one or two model/method. This way it is possible to go deeper with the chosen model(s) and to discuss the differ * Good use of examples, it makes it easy to understand the concept.

...ey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss • I find it an interesting subject to compare stakeholder management in construction pr

**It is organized and easy to follow **It follows the methods structure

...rd. Right now are Figure and Fig used. Try to choose either Figure or Fig. It will not be so confusing and looks better * In the discussion section you haven´t been writing anything yet. It would be useful if you could write about how this model could be compared t

...ey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss ...h precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes (for example: insure the team working on highest va

...ing to look into Lean management and the benefits/limits of this. However, it is a very broad subject and i suggest you try to pick one tool/method that ...r has almost fulfilled the expected structure of this type but I feel that it would have been rewarding for the article if a section about the limitation

However sometimes it seems disconnected with the project management context. ...suggest to focus more on the connection between the model and the benefits it can deliver to a project (ch. 4 benefit – ch 5. Limitations).

Answer: Thank you for this review, it has been very good help when reading through the text. * The article covers some good models. However, it would have been obvious to have more models in the paragraphs, where the ar

...o look at some of the problems occurring by using boundary objects and why it can be difficult to use them for visualization in PM. If Gantt charts are b

... should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only ...eally know about. It is a good chance to read something about lean and how it is used in project management and moreover in a company like Toyota.

Anna: Very nice topic! It seems that you have a good grasp on the structure of the article and the th '''Answer''': Changed it (that's the best I can get)

Mette: Hello, I like your idea. It seems like you have a clear agenda of what you want to write about. Maybe y * The article was interesting and easy to read. It is very much related for the course and relevant for practitioners.

...at you keep you focus on the tool/method itself and that you really relate it properly to the overall topic of project management. The article you are ma ...sting topic, and it seems a bit difficult to structure, but I think you do it nicely and according to the requirements for the method article.

...ompleted, more than 3000 words. Even without any knowledge of the subject, it becomes accessible through the article. ...erm of explanation, the style can be quite repetitive in terms of reading. It may be corrected by introducing some personal comment, or practical example

...le may end up a bit generic, and not as interesting as it could be because it is too broad. So think about tool for risk management and then pick one you

Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific ...ding is fluent and really engaging. Its structure follows perfectly what it is requested by the assignment.

* Another positive aspect is that it follows the method structure. * In addition, it has a good structure of sections and you did a good job with the references