Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • ...d add the topic you have written within the brakets. As you write yourself it would be nice to add something specific/different in the article. * It looks to me as if you are following the ‘method’ structure
    7 KB (1,150 words) - 17:25, 28 September 2015
  • First of all, I think that it is a really good work. You met all the main requirements and succeeded in m ...he track. If you use another figure summarizing your elements, and explain it in this part, that would be perfect.
    4 KB (801 words) - 13:04, 24 September 2015
  • ...at your article is quite good, I liked it when I read it, and in overall, it has been clear to me. Yet, I have some recommendations that you could follo ...he introduction aims to tease people, give the will to read more. In fact, it is in the conclusion that I would summarize the all article and write one o
    4 KB (750 words) - 21:38, 22 September 2015
  • Anna: Very nice topic choice. I like that the method is so specific so that it will allow you to go into greater details in the 3000 word article. “It allows [us/you] to compare the level of agreement with the degree of certai
    7 KB (1,119 words) - 10:30, 27 September 2015
  • Anna: Hi I like the idea, however, I'm afraid that it doesn't really fit into either one of the two article types. This is not re * In my opinion, I think it would make the article easier to be read if you added more full stops and y
    7 KB (1,261 words) - 20:27, 22 September 2015
  • Anna: I like the topic a lot, it gives great opportunity for discussing the advantages and limitations of th * It is noted at the top of the wiki page that the article is a work in progress
    3 KB (610 words) - 17:45, 29 September 2015
  • ...d introduction to the subject and clearly states why it was chosen and why it is relevant to project, program and portfolio management. ... mainly explains the method and does not include any case study, therefore it is recommended that the author stick to the suggested structure for "method
    8 KB (1,400 words) - 13:31, 29 September 2015
  • ...le may end up a bit generic, and not as interesting as it could be because it is too broad. So think about tool for risk management and then pick one you * Nicely structured. It is clean and has a good overview. (Thanks)
    5 KB (816 words) - 13:18, 29 September 2015
  • *Good presentation of the topics, however some minor grammar mistakes make it a little more difficult to be read ... reader to get a better understanding of the topic.= ''I have try to write it more undertandeble''
    4 KB (715 words) - 13:37, 29 September 2015
  • * The layout of this article is very nice, and I like that it has pictures to help explain. **''Well seen, it was a mistake from my part. It can be said both ways, but it is good to use the same one all the article long.''
    8 KB (1,304 words) - 11:00, 25 September 2015
  • Mette: I like your choice of topic and it would be great if you would stick to your thoughts about focusing on the cr
    200 B (37 words) - 14:13, 16 September 2015
  • Anna: I like your topic and the direction it is headed with the focus on the tool within program management. Remember to *It does relate to PPPM. '''Answer''': Good
    4 KB (647 words) - 17:22, 28 September 2015
  • Mette: Looking forward to read more of your article when it is more completed. ...finished yet ☺ But when looking at the structure of it and the headlines it looks good - Both the formatting and the read threat.
    4 KB (744 words) - 21:53, 29 September 2015
  • '''General Overview''': Very good choice of topic as it is relevant to project management. Your article is very engaging and gives Gramatically, everything is correct. It is easy to follow and the main points are well understood as there is a log
    9 KB (1,540 words) - 10:51, 24 September 2015
  • ...le may end up a bit generic, and not as interesting as it could be because it is too broad. So think about tools for fine-tune ideas for projects and the ... recommend having that in the back of your head when you’re proofreading it.
    4 KB (670 words) - 08:29, 29 September 2015
  • ...e your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements. * I think it is good that you suggest real tools for creating Gantt Charts.
    15 KB (2,680 words) - 20:04, 28 September 2015
  • • The article enumerates many terms, and when reading through it can be a little bit too much of this. A suggestion is to have some more exp - '''There are many terms, but I think it is more confusing if the terms are disturbed by a lot of text in between.''
    7 KB (1,293 words) - 18:52, 27 September 2015
  • ...AD. I recognize that it is supposed to be in the context of XPM, but maybe it could be done more easily with linking to other Wiki-pages. ;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
    2 KB (259 words) - 20:29, 22 September 2015
  • ...o change management, so it is good that you already have planned to relate it to portfolio/program management by focusing on the lessons to be learned fo Personally I have the pleasure to read this article and it is very close be finished in my opinion. If you correct the things I pointe
    6 KB (1,039 words) - 13:36, 29 September 2015
  • *Topic; It seems like an interesting topic (method description). However I had a hard ... topic, it would have been nice to get a description of the article. Maybe it could start with: “This article describes how Six Sigma can be used in Pr
    2 KB (418 words) - 15:12, 22 September 2015

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Views
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox