The Rolling-wave Planning

Abstract

It is not often possible to foresee the future activities in a project with consistent detail over the entire period of the project. Therefore, project managers faced with unexpected events employ a “rolling wave” approach to planning. The rolling-wave Planning is a project management technique that requires iterative planning to “roll out” detailed plans for the near term and reevaluate the plan regularly as the project proceeds.The Rolling Wave Planning technique uses progressive elaboration, which is the act of elaborating the work packages in greater detail as the project unfolds.
It is necessary to provide key milestones and assumptions as they will help stakeholders see the reason for using Rolling Wave Planning and what to expect as the project progresses. As the project progresses, the risks, assumptions, and milestones originally identified become more defined and reliable. Rolling Wave Planning focuses the team on the short-term goals, course correcting as needed. The rolling-wave planning is particularly useful in projects with high uncertainty.It is a good idea to have an understanding of the “big blocks” without detailing exactly the scope of the project. The article will introduce the definition of the Rolling Wave Planning and provide the guidelines to develop it. The article will also provide a brief overview of the literature and area where the Rolling Wave can be applied, along with its limitations and benefits.

Introduction

Mountain Climber Analogy

How often have you been asked for estimates of the duration and the cost of a project and have given answers before you really fully understood the scope of the effort? It's related to the discussion of how this scenario develops, why this approach seldom works, and what can be done to structure a more realistic alternative. To address this issue, consider an analogy: Imagine that you are an expert mountain climber, standing at the bottom of an imposing mountain you've never seen before. It's your job to climb over this mountain and reach the bottom on the other side. The person who is funding your expedition asks you “How long will it take you to climb over and get to the bottom on the other side of the mountain, and what resources will you need?” “I don’t know” wouldn’t be a satisfactory answer to your sponsors because they hired you for your expertise in mountain climbing and expects you to come forth with some reasonable answers. On the other hand, if you shoot from the hip, you know the accuracy of your guess will be weak at best, and sooner or later you will have to confront your error. In this case, the rolling wave is an alternative way. This method can both satisfy your sponsor and add a sense of integrity and credibility to your commitments. At the beginning of the climb, you stand at the bottom of the mountain, with minimal knowledge of what confronts you. But your mountain climbing background and experience, combined with historic data gathered from other people who have tried to climb this mountain, allows you to approximate the time and resources required. Note the term is approximate, not estimate. When approximating, afford all the flexibility possible.