Net Present Value (NPV)

From apppm
Revision as of 21:29, 19 March 2022 by DeepthiTharaka (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Written by Deepthi Tharaka Parana Liyanage Don- s203116

Contents

Abstract

Financial appraisal is a method used to evaluate whether a proposed project or portfolio of investment projects is worthwhile by considering the benefits and costs that result from its execution [1]. Investment decisions of the management are critical to a company since it decides the future of the company. This article discusses the net present value (NPV) method which is widely used in the financial appraisal. NPV is a dynamic financial appraisal method that considers the time value of money by applying discounting to all future payment series during the investment period [1]. In simple terms, the NPV is the difference between the project's future incoming and outgoing cash flows at present time. The calculation of the NPV starts by determining the net cash flows from the difference of future incoming cash flows and outgoing cash flows for each period of an investment. After the net cash flow for each period is calculated, the present value (PV) of each one is achieved by discounting using a suitable discount rate. NPV is the cumulative value of all the discounted future net cash flows [1] [2].

Firstly, this article discusses the idea behind the NPV method. Then this introduces the NPV calculation method [1] and describes the importance of choosing the suitable discount rate [3]. Also, it discusses the other NPV formula for special cases such as annuity and perpetuity. Then it highlights the decision criteria behind NPV and explains it with real-life applications. Finally, it critically reflects on the limitations [4] of this method and briefly highlights the key references used in this article.

Big Idea

According to ISO 21502, a business case is a documented justification to support decision-making about the commitment to a project, program or portfolio [5]. Development of a business case is a critical point in a project, program or portfolio where it uses to obtain the approval by presenting the benefits, cost, and risk associated with alternative options [6] [7] [8]. The business case is produced by the client or the sponsor of the project, program or portfolio and the directorate of an organization uses this document to accept or reject the case. [9]. In a business case, financial appraisal plays a key role to answer the main questions of whether an investment should be made and which project should be chosen among a selection of different alternatives. Because the task of financial appraisal is to predict the financial effects of planned investment and to present the data to get critical investment decisions [1]. NPV method is one of the most frequently used approaches in the financial appraisal of a project [1] [10].

What is NPV?

NPV is the present value of the future net cash flows of an investment. [1]. In other words, NPV is the difference between the present value of all future incoming and outgoing cash flows. The NPV of a project is calculated based on different assumptions [3] [4] [11] such as:

  • Money in the future will not be worth the same amount of money today. Therefore, all the future cash flows are translated to present value by discounting them using a suitable discount rate.
  • The discount rate remains the same throughout the life of the project.
  • The incoming or outgoing cash flows other than the initial investment occur at the end of each period.

NPV is a widely used method in the financial appraisal that has the following benefits [4] :

  • NPV considers the concept of the time value of money by obtaining the present value of future net cash flows.
  • NPV calculation considers the complete life cycle of an investment using the expected future cash flows in different periods of time.
  • It has the additive property. That means the possibility to sum the NPV of individual projects to evaluate the project portfolio.
  • NPV method enables the decision-making process for companies by identifying whether a particular investment is profit-making or loss-making.

Time value of money

NPV considers the time value of money in the analysis, which makes the NPV more precise than other financial appraisal methods. Time value of money means that a sum of money is worth more now than the same sum of money in the future [3] [4] [12]. That is because the money you have now can use to make more money by buying something now and selling it later for more, running a business or depositing it in the bank, and earning interest. Since money can grow only through investing, investment delay is an opportunity cost. That means not having the money right now also includes the loss of additional income, which could be earned by having money earlier. Future money is also less valuable because inflation erodes its buying power. Moreover, receiving money in the future rather than now may involve some risk and uncertainty regarding its recovery. For these reasons, future cash flows are worth less than the present cash flows. NPV assesses the profitability of a given project on the basis that cash flow in the future is not worth the same as a cash flow today. The time value of money is recognized in NPV by applying discounting to all future cash flows generated during the investment period using a suitable discount rate[10].

Discount Rate

Figure 3: NPV vs. Discount rate (i). Own creation inspired from [2].

The discount rate is the rate used to determine the present value of future cash flows in NPV calculation. The choice of the discount rate can dramatically change the NPV since the NPV is an inverse function of the discount rate (i) [2]. The selection of discount rate will be company-specific since it is related to how the company finds its funds [3]. If an investment is financed completely with equity, the discount rate can be obtained from a cost of equity. On the other hand, if the investment is completely debt-financed it can be analyzed using the cost of debt. If an investment depends on both equity and debt financing, the discount rate is the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and can be calculated as the weighted average of the cost of equity and cost of debt [3]. WACC is often used in companies as the discount rate [1]. For small projects, where it is hard to identify the equity and debt used for financing a single project, the WACC of the whole company is usually assumed as the discount rate [3].

However, it is appropriate to use higher discount rates to reflect other factors such as risk, the opportunity cost of money invested in the infrastructure and etc [2]. Also, NPV calculated using variable discount rates may better reflect the situation than one calculated from a constant discount rate for the entire investment duration [1].

Formula

The following formula use these common variables [1]:

Variable Meaning
P V Present Value
t Time of the cashflow
C I _{t} Cash inflows in period t
C O _{t} Cash outflows in period t
{\left(C I _{t}-C O _{t}\right)} = N C _{t} Net cash flow in period t
I_{o} Investment in t=0
L_{n} Liquidation proceeds in t=n
i The discount rate
n Total number of periods
Figure 1: Projection of a future net cash flow in time t into a present value. Own creation inspired from [11].

In order to consider the time value of money, the NPV method considers the value of an investment at the present time by projecting all future cash flows into a key figure at the time today. This projection of the value that a future cash flow has in the present is called present value (PV). To get the present value of a future net cash flow in period t, it is discounted using a discount rate (i) as follows:

P V=\frac{\left(C I _{t}-C O _{t}\right)}{(1+i)^{t}} [1]

Example 1:

If a project is expected to receive $5,000 with 10% discount rate after 4 years, its present value (PV) can be calculated as:

P V=\frac{\left(C I _{t}-C O _{t}\right)}{(1+i)^{t}} [1]

P V=\frac{5000}{(1+0.1)^{4}} = $3415


NPV combines these projections of net cash flows to assess the overall value of a project from the present view. Therefore the NPV is given by:

N P V=\sum_{t=0}^{n} \frac{\left(C I _{t}-C O _{t}\right)}{(1+i)^{t}} [1]

Figure 2: Illustration of calculation procedure of NPV. Own creation inspired from [11]

The difference between the cash inflows and cash outflows, {\left(C I _{t}-C O _{t}\right)} gives the net cash flow, N C _{t} of the corresponding period. For normal investments which are characterized by initial investment, I_{0}, subtracting the initial investment outlay, I_{0} from the present value of the net cash flows gives the net present value. If a possible final payment, L_{n}, for the liquidation of the investment in t = n is also considered, the calculation of the NPV can be written as follows [1]:

N P V=-I_{0}+\sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{N C _{t}}{(1+i)^{t}}+\frac{L_{n}}{(1+i)^{n}} [1]


As a summary, the following steps are recommended for the calculation of the net present value [1]:

  1. Determination of the initial investment, I_{0} .
  2. Estimate the expected net cash flows, N C _{t} for each period.
  3. Selection of the uniform discount rate, i.
  4. Determination of the present values by discounting the net cash flows and obtaining the summation.
  5. Subtraction of the initial investment, I_{0} from the summation of the present values. This gives the net present value.

Example 2:

A company decides to invest $100,000 for a project which is expected to give the following cash flows. Assume the discount rate is 10%. Calculate the NPV of the project.

Now Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Initial Investment $100,000
Running costs $60,000 $90,000 $90,000
Revenues $80,000 $100,000 $120,000
Liquidation proceeds $140,000

Using NPV formula, NPV can be calculated as follows:

N P V=-I_{0}+\sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{N C _{t}}{(1+i)^{t}}+\frac{L_{n}}{(1+i)^{n}} [1]

N P V=-100,000+ \frac{(-60,000+80,000)}{(1+0.1)^{1}}+ \frac{(-90,000+100,000)}{(1+0.1)^{2}}+\frac{(-90,000+120,000)}{(1+0.1)^{3}}+\frac{140,000}{(1+0.1)^{3}}

N P V=-100,000+ 18182+ 8265+ 22539+ 105184 = $54170

Other NPV Formula

NPV of an annuity

If the net cash inflows are uniform and equidistant and occur at the end of each period, the series of net cash flows can be interpreted as an annuity [1]. The payments or receipts occur at the end of each period for an ordinary annuity while they occur at the beginning of each period for an annuity due. Using the formula for the present value of an ordinary annuity, NPV can be calculated as follows [1]:

N P V=-I_{0}+N C  \cdot\left[\frac{(1+i)^{n}-1}{i \cdot(1+i)^{n}}\right]+\frac{L_{n}}{(1+i)^{n}} [1]

Example 3:

If a company decides to invest $100,000 for a project which is expected to give the following cash flows. Assume the discount rate is 10%. Calculate the NPV of the project.

Now Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Initial Investment $100,000
Net cash flows $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
Liquidation proceeds $140,000


Using NPV of an annuity formula,

N P V=-I_{0}+N C  \cdot\left[\frac{(1+i)^{n}-1}{i \cdot(1+i)^{n}}\right]+\frac{L_{n}}{(1+i)^{n}} [1]

N P V=-100,000 + 60,000 \cdot\left[\frac{(1+0.1)^{3}-1}{0.1 \cdot(1+0.1)^{3}}\right]+\frac{140,000}{(1+0.1)^{3}}

N P V=-100,000 + 149211 + 105184 = $154395

NPV of a perpetuity

For the special case that, net cash flow is considered as perpetuity, which is given for an infinite and constant stream of identical cash flows the NPV can be expressed as follows [1]:

N P V=-I_{0}+\frac{N C}{i} [1]

Example 4:

A company decides to invest $100,000 for a project which is expected to give a net cash flow of $60,000 in perpetuity with a discount rate of 10%. Calculate the NPV.

Using The NPV of a perpetuity formula,

N P V=-I_{0}+\frac{N C}{i}

N P V=-100,000+\frac{60,000}{0.1}

N P V=-100,000+ 600,000 = $500,000


Decision rule

NPV is used to assess the attractiveness of the investment and it shows how much value an investment or project adds to the firm and the decision to accept or reject the investment is taken based on the following decision rule [1].

Condition Idea Decision
If NPV > 0 Investment increases the value (profit) of the company in the amount of the NPV. Investment can be accepted.
If NPV = 0 No increase or decrease in wealth results. This project adds no monetary value. Difficult to get the decision whether to accept or reject the project. Decisions should be based on other criteria.
If NPV < 0 Investment would destroy value (profit) in an amount equal to the negative NPV. The investment can be rejected.

As a summary, the following two profitability criteria must be met for the economic viability of an investment [1]:

  • Absolute profitability: NPV of an investment option must be positive or at least zero (NPV≥ 0).
  • Relative profitability: The option with the highest positive NPV is the most profitable and usually the preferred option, provided that the investment risk is the same.

Applications

For businesses, the NPV method facilitates decision-making in the investments of projects, programs, and portfolios since it helps to determine whether a given investment is profitable or loss-making. As explained in previous examples in the above sections, NPV can be calculated simply using the corresponding formula. Generally, NPV is widely used to evaluate the financial viability of different types of investments such as independent projects, mutually exclusive projects, contingency projects and etc [4].

  • Independent Projects:

An Independent project is a project where the acceptance or rejection does not depend on the acceptance or rejection of other projects. If the organization has the capacity to run several projects at once, in the case of independent projects, all profitable projects will be accepted and ranking is not really important [4].

Example 5:

A company has an opportunity to invest in the construction of a new production line and at the same time the reconstruction of a factory currently used to produce one of its products. Net cash flows of the two projects are as follows and assume that the discount rate is 10% for both projects.

Now Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 NPV
Construction of a new production line -$1,000,000 $75,000 $275,000 $450,000 $500,000 $525,000 $198,350
Reconstruction of a factory -$1,000,000 $600,000 $575,000 $75,000 - - $250,000

Since both NPV > 0, the company can accept the investment in both projects since it has the ability to invest in both.

  • Mutually Exclusive Projects:

Investment projects are said to be mutually exclusive when the selection of one will exclude the acceptance of the other. In simple terms, the acceptance of one prevents the acceptance of an alternative proposal. Because two or more projects cannot be pursued simultaneously due to different constraints in projects, programs, or portfolios. In the case of mutually exclusive projects; NPV is a widely used method to select which project or program is important to invest and the one with the higher NPV should be selected [1] [4].

Example 6:

A company has a place, which can be used to build a food manufacturing business or a steel manufacturing plant. The company cannot implement both projects due to financial constraints. The expected net cash flows associated with the two projects are as follows and assume a 10% discount rate.

Now Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 NPV
Food manufacturing business -$5,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $300,000 $489,590
Steel manufacturing plant -$5,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,900,000 $2,200,000 $2,300,000 $745,660

Even though both projects give positive NPV, the company cannot invest in both since they are mutually exclusive. Therefore it has to select the project which gives the highest NPV. In this case, it is the steel manufacturing plant.

  • Contingent Projects:

Contingent projects are dependent projects where the acceptance or rejection of one project necessitates acceptance or rejection of one or more other projects [4]. For Example, the decision to invest in a medical testing laboratory may depend on the decision to build a private hospital nearby. The cash inflows of the medical testing laboratory will be enhanced by the presence of a nearby hospital and vice versa. This enhancement of the cashflows from the contingent projects must consider in the NPV calculation to get the right decision.

Limitations

  • NPV calculation is based on several estimates such as future cash flows and discount rate, therefore there is a high chance for errors that can drastically affect the end result of the calculation. Since every project has a unique set of processes there is lots of room for errors in estimating cash flows. NPV often takes an optimistic approach to future cash flow calculations by overestimating benefits (incoming cashflows) and underestimating costs (outgoing cashflows). These problems can be mitigated by double-checking estimates, performing sensitivity analysis or Monte Carlo analysis after doing the initial calculations [2] [12]. On the other hand, Investment decisions based on the NPV method are highly sensitive to the selected discount rate. Using a discount rate that is too low will make suboptimal investments and using too high will result in rejecting good investments. Moreover, the NPV is calculated based on the assumption that the discount rate remains the same throughout the life of the project. Therefore, it does not account for the fluctuation of discount rates according to the market situation [4]. To remove this limitation NPV can be calculated using variable discount rates if they are known for the duration of the investment [1].
  • The NPV is expressed in absolute terms rather than relative terms. Therefore it does not useful for comparing projects of different sizes as the largest projects typically generate the highest returns [4]. If there are two projects for decision, and one project is larger in scale, the NPV will be higher for that project. Therefore, it is important to assess the returns from an investment in percentage terms to get an accurate picture of which investment provides a better return.
  • It does not consider the non-cash benefits and costs generated from a project while making decisions. NPV method is purely quantitive in nature and does not consider qualitative factors. However, it is important to consider both quantitative and qualitative benefits and costs associated with a project [5].

Annotated Bibliography

Häcker J. and Ernst D., Ch. 8 - Investment Appraisal. In: Financial Modeling. Global Financial Markets(2017), pp.343-384

The investment appraisal chapter in the Financial modeling book by Häcker J. and Ernst D. introduces the concept of financial appraisal and provides a good overview of methods used in appraising a project, program, or portfolio. Writers introduce the concept of NPV and clearly describe the NPV calculation method and the decision rule behind the selection of projects based on NPV. This book is an ideal source to provide a good explanation of the concept of financial appraisal, the concept of NPV, how to calculate NPV, other formulas of NPV in different scenarios such as annuity, perpetuity, etc.

Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M. and Tei, A., Ch. 5 - Investment Appraisal. In: Economic role of transport infrastructure: Theory and models (2018), pp. 85-114

Chapter 5 of Economic role of transport infrastructure: Theory and models book by Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M., and Tei, A. introduce the importance of investment appraisal in large projects such as transport infrastructure. It critically highlights the different financial appraisal methods and it especially highlights the importance of NPV in the context of large projects. Especially it points out the relationship of discount rate with NPV and the importance of selecting the correct discount rate when the projects are appraised based on NPV. Additionally, it introduces the importance of performing sensitivity analysis when calculating NPV.

Žižlavský O., Net present value approach: method for economic assessment of innovation projects., 19th International Scientific Conference, Economics and Management, (2014), pp. 506-512

The paper 'Net present value approach' by Žižlavský O. was a useful reference to get a thorough idea about the appraisal of projects using the NPV method. It highlights the importance of the time value of money and approaches used to select the suitable discount rate.

Bora, B., Comparison between net present value and internal rate of return, International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, (2015), pp.61-71

The research paper, 'comparison between net present value and internal rate of return' by Bora, B. provides a comprehensive discussion on the NPV method. This critically highlights the benefits and limitations of the NPV method and its applications in different investments.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 Häcker J. and Ernst D., Ch. 8 - Investment Appraisal. In: Financial Modeling. Global Financial Markets, (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2017), pp. 343-384, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42658-1_8
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M. and Tei, A., Ch. 5 - Investment Appraisal. In: Economic role of transport infrastructure: Theory and models, (Elsevier, 2018), pp. 85-114, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-03558-1
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Žižlavský, O., Net present value approach: method for economic assessment of innovation projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19th International Scientific Conference, Economics and Management, 156 (2014), pp. 506-512.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Bora, B., Comparison between net present value and internal rate of return, International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, (2015), 5(12), pp.61-71
  5. 5.0 5.1 International Organization for Standardization (ISO, 2021), Project, programme and portfolio management – Context and concepts (DS/ISO 21502:2021).
  6. AXELOS, Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, 6th Edition, (The Stationery Office Ltd, 2017).
  7. AXELOS, and Office Cabinet., Managing Successful Programmes, 2011 Edition, (The Stationery Office Ltd, 2011).
  8. AXELOS, Office of Government Commerce, Kilford, C., Management of Portfolios, 2011 Edition, (The Stationery Office Ltd, 2011).
  9. Ing E. and Lester A., Ch. 5 - Business case and Ch. 6 - Investment Appraisal. In: Project Management, Planning and Control. 7th Edition, (Elsevier, 2017), pp. 25-36, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102020-3.00006-1
  10. 10.0 10.1 Konstantin P. and Konstantin M., Ch. 4 - Investment Appraisal Methods. In: Power and Energy Systems Engineering Economics, (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 39-64, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72383-9_4
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Poggensee K. and Poggensee J., Ch. 3 - Dynamic Investment Calculation Methods. In: Investment Valuation and Appraisal, (Springer, Cham, 2021), pp. 85-140, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62440-8
  12. 12.0 12.1 LOCK, D., Project management. 10th edition, (Farnham, Surrey, England, Gower Pub., 2013).
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox