Sources of conflict
Abstract
Conflict is inevitable in organizations. If organizational conflicts are not managed well, it may lead to decreasing team performance and have a negative effect on the outcome [kilde!]. Conflict management can be defined as the practice of identifying and handling conflicts. One of the best practices for effective conflict management is to address conflict early to prevent it from escalating, hence it is essential to be able to recognize and understand the different sources of conflict. A project manager must understand how and when a conflict should be encouraged, while others should be resolved quickly [kilde!].
This article aims to explain several aspects of organizational conflict in the early stage to provide a better understanding of how to avoid and handle conflict. Different literature is applied to give a broad perspective on the source of conflict. This article focuses on the primary sources of organizational conflict and hereby how an organizational conflict may evolve.
Contents |
Characteristics of conflict
There is a lot of literature on conflict, and it is perceived differently from the scholar in various fields such as sociology, economics, anthropology, etc. hence, there is no universally accepted definition [kilde!]. Although Rahim (2001) conclude that the various definitions overlap with the following elements:
- Conflicting interests between individuals and/or groups,
- The conflicting interests must be recognized of a conflict to exist,
- Conflict is a process; it arises from existing relationships between individuals or groups, reflecting on their past interactions and the contexts in which these took place.
- Actions from one or both sides result in the goals of others being obstructed .[1]
Conflict is an interactive process that originates from incompatibility and disagreement dissonance within or between social entities, e.g., individual, group, organization, etc. [kilde 6] This is supported by Roloff's (1987) definition, which explains the occurrence of as an organizational conflict by: “members engage in activities that are incompatible with those of colleagues within their network, members of other collectivizes, or unaffiliated individuals who utilize the services or products of the organization” [kilde 6]
[2]
The literature disagrees on whether an organizational conflict is detrimental or beneficial for an organization. There is a primary view of conflict as a negative process in organizations [3]. However, more literature has begun to perceive conflict functional for the organization. A moderate amount of conflict managed constructively can contribute to attaining and maintaining the desired level of organizational effectiveness [(Rahim & Bonoma, 1979].
The impact of conflict on a team's performance depends on the specific type of conflict experienced within the team and organization [intragroup]. The table below lists some examples of dysfunctional and functional outcomes from conflict an organization may encounter.
Dysfunctional outcomes: | Functional outcomes: |
---|---|
Detriment the team and individual effectiveness | Enhance the team and individual performance |
Decrease communication between individuals and groups | Increasing creativity and stimulating innovation |
Deteriorate the project’s outcome | Improve decision making |
Type of conflicts
This article divides conflict based on its organizational level since all types of conflict does not function similarly. It is to distinguish between the types of conflict to understand the different sources of conflict.
Organizational conflict can occur in and between individuals and within and between groups. The different types of intraorganizational conflicts are divided into the organizational levels; intrapersonal, interpersonal, intragroup and intergroup.
Intrapersonal: This type of conflict is experienced within an individual when the performance of a task is inconsistent with the person’s expertise, interest, goals, and values [the book]. The conflict arises when incompatible demands are required of an organizational member to their job or position - this is also called role conflict.
Interpersonal: This type of conflict arises due to fundamental differences between two or more organizational members who are required to interact to perform a task.
Intragroup: This type of conflict is experienced among the members of a group or its subgroup, where the members conflict regarding the task, goals, interest, procedures etc. [kilde!]
There are two main types of intragroup conflicts: Relationship conflict is experienced when the group members struggle with interpersonal relationships regardless of the task. Task conflict refers to a disagreement among the group members about the best practices for performing the task.
Intergroup: Intergroup conflict is common in an organization [kilde 1]. This type of conflict arises when there are disagreements or differences between two or more groups or departments within an organization - production, marketing, headquarters are some examples of departments.
Source of conflicts
Multiple authors of different studies/fields have researched the topic ‘conflict’, which has led to the identification of many sources of conflicts [missing source]. The most relevant sources of organizational conflict will be provided in this section. The sources of conflicts will be discussed regarding the type of conflicts (the four level of conflicts).
Intrapersonal conflict:
Rahim and Bonoma (1979) have identified two interesting sources of intrapersonal conflict, which is examined as followed: [missing source].
Misassignment and goal congruence: An intrapersonal conflict may occur if an employee is misassigned to do a task that the person is not competent to accomplish. The employee may feel undesirable frustration if the person does not possess the appropriate expertise and aptitude to do the job. Furthermore, the organization's goals must be consistent with the employee's goals and expectations to motivate and optimize the employee [missing source].
Inappropriate demand on capacity: An employee may experience an intrapersonal conflict if it is not possible for the person to properly fulfil all the demands of the employee's position even by working at the maximum capacity. In addition, if the employee's expectation of their role is not met, the person can find the job demotivated, initiating an intrapersonal conflict [missing source].
Interpersonal conflict:
Also named; relationship- and emotional conflict. There exist different sources of interpersonal conflict. The most significant are further elaborated in the following sections. Emotions are a general contributor to the escalation of these conflicts since they control and direct behaviours [5].
Personality clash means that two individuals disagree because of fundamental differences in goals, values, etc. People perceive things differently, making it difficult to understand one who is the opposite [missing source]. If people are experience inconsistencies with their integrity, it can be almost impossible to reach a compromise which often leads to a conflict.
Lack of trust among the employees can be destructive for the projects and the organisation. The employees work towards collective goals, which makes their tasks dependent on each other. Therefore, are the employees interdependent, making it necessary to build trust within the organisation to prevent conflicts.
Ineffective communication may initiate a conflict since people often fail to communicate about complex matters, especially in emotional situations. Conflict often escalates because people assume they have communicated accurately when this is not the case. If individuals could preserve a rational approach and establish effective communication, many conflicts never occur or quickly deescalate. Projects are managed through communication, which makes it a key factor for projects to succeed.
Different interests and incompatible goals can be sources of conflict, especially when it compromises with individuals' interests and goals. [Missing texts]
Intragroup conflict:
There are several sources of such conflict and the most significant are further elaborated in the following sections:
Task structure:
Group composition and size:
Cohesiveness and group thinking:
Outcomes:
Application
Understand the source of conflict to solve and prevent it from happening (escalating)
Utilizing conflict management in practice
Limitations
A lot of theories on reasons for conflicts to occur (only elaborated few aspects)
Different kinds of projects (in complexity, etc.) and organizational factors (organizational structure)
Annotated bibliography
Further reading
More aspects to explore
References
- ↑ Rahim, M.A. Managing Conflict in Organizations. (2001). Routledge.
- ↑ Roloff, M.E. Interpersonal communication: the social exchange approach. (1981). Sage, Beverly Hills, Ca.
- ↑ Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: a Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-Outcome Relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(03), 187–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
- ↑ xxx
- ↑ Mayer B. The dynamics of conflict resolution: a practitioner’s guide. (2000) San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass.