Talk:Metra Potential Method

Anna: Nice choice of method, you seem to have understood the requirements to both topic and structure, so I don't have any further comments.

Reviewer 1: Alise

• The layout of this article is very nice, and I like that it has pictures to help explain.
• When MPM is mentioned, why write Potential Metra Methods, and not Metra Potential Methods, as stated in the heading?
• Writing the two last sentences about Bernard Roy seems kind of messy when it’s at the bottom of the subject, when you mention him in the beginning without giving him much attention.
• I don’t think you should use “… “after any sentence. (See Overview)
• I found the description in “List of task” not very easy to follow. Maybe structure this in another way?
• Why isn’t the method for calculating the duration of tasks not specified? Doesn’t it include in the implementation of the MPM?
• I had some problems understanding how to calculate “earliest start”
• You have some sentences that could be written better. For example: “It results that bigger is the number of critical tasks with respect to the total number of tasks, lower is the elasticity of the project.” You should write: “The result of this will be that the bigger the numbers of critical tasks with respect to the total number of tasks, the lower the elasticity of the project.” (this is just one)
• Remember references!
• I like how you have compared the MPM method to both the Gantt and the PERT method.