Talk:Risk Profile in General Contracting

s141931, reviewer 1

Obviously, the article is missing and only the summary is present. It is therefore difficult and pointless to make an evaluation. However, it seems you have an idea about correct 'wiki' formatting, and the topic itself sounds to be relevant and promising, good luck in executing!

KB1991, reviewer 2:

What there is written so far is good.
Good introduction that describes the topic briefly, but the last part has been written twice.
The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat.
Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺

The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing

The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work
The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work

The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m.

The topic is really interesting and it also seems very actual in construction projects.

I like the introduction which I find clear and well structured, keep attention a part is repeated twice!

However, it's hard to give a feedback since most part of the article is missing.

Looking forward for the final article!

Formal Aspects

Content Aspects

Nice and understandable flow. I liked the general introduction and then the emphasis on your subject
No grammar or syntax mistakes
The advantages and disadvantages section would go better in the part where you focus on (risk profile in general contracting)
The main part of your article should be more extensive and analytical to help the reader understand more of this method.