Talk:SWOT analysis

From apppm
Revision as of 16:45, 25 November 2014 by Tallimac (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Feedback by Tallimac

Introduction

  • ..on the contrary many papers, books and articles.. - You must have a bunch of articles ready for reference when writing a statement like this
  • optimisingly treated - I don't like that phrasing :)
  • I like the idea of "...to present the reader with a guide on how to perform a conventional SWOT..." - This should however in my opinion be in the abstract and not in the introduction. Actually i think that you should "slow down" and give a good and deep step by step guide in how to perform a SWOT

History

  • Boring but okay :)

SWOT matrix

  • These 3 steps are not enough try to elaborate on them and suggets how you might perform the steps
  • Then i smooth connection will be that your step 3 will be going towards the TOWS and then action plan much later
  • i Would rename External factors to synergy tools or something like that. Then write about how the SWOT brilliant works togehter with P5F and PESTEL

Other

  • Maybe create a simple pro-con list that can can help the reader decide if he/she can make use of the SWOT tool
  • Remember the conclusion - and write the take home messages very simple
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox