Talk:Systems Engineering versus Project Management, a comparative study

From apppm
Revision as of 17:46, 25 November 2014 by LasseMadsen (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Feedback by Lasse Madsen

Fist impression:

  • The article is very well structured, and invites the reader to read along.
  • The grammar and spelling is very good, and the content is easy to understand, due to the structure and grammar. I would though, suggest to make it bullet proof by adding additional "," where sentences get long. Especially towards the end of the article.

Formal aspects

  • I would put the introduction before the content to provide a read threat.
  • i miss some more WIKI formatting, ie.
    • Categories: [[Categories:Management]]
    • References to other wiki sites: [[project management]]
    • Figures could alternatively be in the right hand side in stead of as part of the text. The problem is, that if you have a small screen, the figures will go out of the screen. Code: [[File:FILENAME.png‎|200px|thumb|right|FIGURE TEXT]]
    • I miss figure text. Could be solved by the method above.
  • I would consider to use the references more than once like: this [1], then the same reference could be used here [1] and here [1] and even here [1] as well :-). (look into the code of this to see how it could be done, if you are interested.
  • Maybe include figure references, if the figures is not reproduced by the author of the article.

Content aspects

  • The article clearly relates to the course, and provides a good overview of methods of systems enginnering vs. project management.
  • The references used including the way of referring is very good. I would though suggest to use the references more than once, especially when stating


Used for reference example

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Hasan, Helen, and Alanah Kazlauskas. "The Cynefin framework: putting complexity into perspective." (2014): 55.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox