Talk:Systems Engineering versus Project Management, a comparative study
From apppm
Revision as of 17:55, 25 November 2014 by LasseMadsen (Talk | contribs)
Feedback by Lasse Madsen
Fist impression:
- The article is very well structured, and invites the reader to read along.
- The grammar and spelling is very good, and the content is easy to understand, due to the structure and grammar. I would though, suggest to make it bullet proof by adding additional "," where sentences get long. Especially towards the end of the article.
Formal aspects
- I would put the introduction before the content to provide a read threat.
- i miss some more WIKI formatting, ie.
- Categories: [[Categories:Management]]
- References to other wiki sites: [[project management]]
- Figures could alternatively be in the right hand side in stead of as part of the text. The problem is, that if you have a small screen, the figures will go out of the screen. Code: [[File:FILENAME.png|200px|thumb|right|FIGURE TEXT]]
- I miss figure text. Could be solved by the method above.
- I would consider to use the references more than once like: this [1], then the same reference could be used here [1] and here [1] and even here [1] as well :-). (look into the code of this to see how it could be done, if you are interested.
- Maybe include figure references, if the figures is not reproduced by the author of the article.
Content aspects
- The article clearly relates to the course, and provides a good overview of methods of systems enginnering vs. project management.
- The references used including the way of referring is very good. I would though suggest to use the references more than once.
- I would have enjoyed to read examples of uses of the V-model and how this could help practioneers in relations to other models.
- I like that the author of the article finishes off with reflections of practise.
Used for reference example
