Talk:Risk register

Structure

• The language is clear and easily understandable. A couple commas may be missing and in the first section paragraph 3 "The risk register cannot only be used as a motivating risk management tool" could be formulated as "The risk register can be used not only as a motivating risk management tool;" apart from that it's good.
• There's just one figure, more could be added as the article grows.
• References to links are nicely made, the article uses a book, this should be referenced in the traditional wiki way <references />.
• A category from APPPM is added which is nice, maybe add a few more e.g. Uncertainty, Risk etc.
• Layout seems to be ok as well.

Content

• The article is obviously not finished yet (778 words as of the writing of this review) So the review can only regard the initial part.
• The article clearly falls under the 'in-depth description of a particular method' category. It relates deeply to project management and, judging by the links attached, is based on fresh data.
• The abstract is good in length and shows a fair purpose behind the tool. It could however include a few sentences about the tool itself, short summary, instead of a rather strong opinion that it's "THE optimum [...] tool within project management".
• As mentioned before any book references should be added along with additional categories in APPPM wiki for further reading.