Talk:Systems Engineering versus Project Management, a comparative study

Feedback by Lasse Madsen

Fist impression:

The article is very well structured, and invites the reader to read along.
The grammar and spelling is very good, and the content is easy to understand due to the structure and grammar. I would though, suggest to add additional "," where sentences get long. Especially moving towards the end of the article.

I would put the introduction before the content to provide a read threat.
I miss some more WIKI formatting, ie.
- Categories: [[Categories:Management]]
- References to other wiki sites: [[project management]]
- Figures could alternatively be in the right hand side in stead of as part of the text. The problem is, that if you have a small screen, the figures will go out of the screen. Code: [[File:FILENAME.png‎|200px|thumb|right|FIGURE TEXT]]
- I miss figure text. Could be solved by the method above.
I would consider to use the references more than once like: this ^[1], then the same reference could be used here ^[1] and here ^[1] and even here ^[1] as well :-). (look into the code of this to see how it could be done, if you are interested.
Maybe include figure references, if the figures is not reproduced by the author of the article.

The article clearly relates to the course, and provides a good overview of methods of systems enginnering vs. project management.
The references used including the way of referring is very good. I would though suggest to use the references more than once.
I would have enjoyed to read examples of uses of the V-model and how this could help practioneers in relations to other models.
I like that the author of the article finishes off with reflections of practise.

Used for reference example

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 ^1.2 ^1.3 Hasan, Helen, and Alanah Kazlauskas. "The Cynefin framework: putting complexity into perspective." (2014): 55.