Comparison of Schedule Managing Methods

Projects involve many different tasks that must be done to complete the project. Many of these tasks will in construction projects logically depend on each other. For example, it is necessary to build supporting walls or columns before the roof can be installed. There are several methods to keep track of these dependencies. In this article similar methods will be explained and their differences will be compared together with their pros and cons. The life cycle of construction projects can overall be split into two groups. Either the project will be planned and managed with a sequential life cycle or an adaptive life cycle. The main difference between the two are that the sequential life cycle has a number of tasks that depends on each other and are planned very early in the project. It is difficult to change the plan as the project progresses which makes it vulnerable to delays. The adaptive life cycle on the other hand makes a rough plan with the overall tasks in the beginning of the project. The detailed planning of the individual tasks are then done as the project progresses. This way of planning is therefore less vulnerable to delays.

Description of different schedule managing methods

When it comes to schedule managing methods in construction there are two overall ways the project life cycle is manged. These are sequential life cycle and adaptive life cycle.

The sequential life cycle

The sequential life cycle is the most traditional way of managing construction projects whereas the adaptive methods has not been used as much. The main idea of the sequential life cycle is that the entire project is planned early on in the project. The plan consists of different phases which have specified ending criteria which have to be met before the successor phase can begin. This also means that the entire project has to well know. Since the entire project is planned in the early stages of the project, this way of planning is vulnerable to unforeseen changes which could have huge effects on the upcoming phases. There are several ways of conducting a sequential life cycle such as the critical path method, the critical chain method and the limited space analysis (LSA)/Location-based Scheduling (LSB).

The critical path method works by dividing a project into smaller tasks. The duration for these tasks are estimated by either comparing similar tasks in earlier projects or by asking those who are in charge of the specific task. These duration estimates naturally have some amount of uncertainty; however, this uncertainty is not considered in the critical path method. This uncertainty either must be accepted or considered externally with the use of probabilistic methods. When the tasks are defined and the durations are specified, the tasks can be put into a schedule. The schedule is made so that tasks that needs other tasks to finish beforehand are put in a path. The longest duration of the paths then defines the critical path and thereby the shortest execution time of the project.

The critical path method does not take resources into account when calculating the shortest execution time. For this, other methods can be used such as the critical chain method. This method takes labour and equipment into account. The critical chain in the project is calculated similarly to the critical path method however this method calculated the longest resource-constrained path.

In small construction sites with limited space the workers may not be able to work effectively simultaneously. The critical space analysis addresses this issue by using the available space as a resource similarly to the critical chain method. The fastest execution time of the project then depends on reduced effectiveness of the work.

The adaptive life cycle

The adaptive life cycle, as the name states, is a managing method that adapts to the projects as it progresses. The way this is typically done in construction, is to have a rough overall plan which is then planned in detail as the project goes on. This way of managing a project can be done by using the last planner technique which is based on continuous planning made together with the contractors. The planning is usually done once per week involving detailed planning the activities for the upcoming week and more rough planning of the upcoming 1-3 months. With this way of managing the project, the effect from unforeseen changes to the initial plan becomes much easier to overcome since the continuous planning can reschedule the tasks. By rescheduling tasks this way, delayed tasks has less influence of the total life time of the project compared to sequential planning where the other tasks would not begin before the delayed task would be finished.

A way to make a plan for an adaptive life cycle is to make a dependency structure matrix (DSM). The dependency structure matrix consists of all design tasks in a matrix form in both rows and columns. *INPUT FIGURE OF MATRIX* The way the matrix works is that all tasks that depends on information from other tasks gets the box filled in. The matrix will then have a filled diagonal which simply shows that each task depends on itself. All the filled boxes below the diagonal is not a problem as they will have the required information in time. The filled boxes above the diagonal, however, depends on information from tasks that starts later. The only way to handle such tasks is to either estimate the required information or simply delay the completion of the tasks .

Application

LBS

Annotated Bibliography

Winch, Graham (2010), "Managing Construction Projects. An Information Processing Approach" Second Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom. ISBN 978-1-4051-8457-1.

Description.

Andersson, Niclas & Christensen Knud (2007), "Location-based Scheduling", DTU BYG, Denmark. ISBN 9788778772411.

Description.