Talk:Critical Chain Project Management

The way, in which the article is explained is good, I like the structure, and as the subject is covered from history to development.

Content aspects

• The article is well related to portfolio management and project management, the way it has been categorized is consistent
• I think the use of 3500 words is not necessary for this article, the issue is well explained in a concise manner, facilitating the understanding of the tool.
• The topic is referenced correctly, consistent sources
• I think this tool is a great contribution to future students of the course

Formal aspects

• I find the article easy to read, I like the style in which it was written
• Overall I see a good structure of the article, I see that is well structured, and it shows that the topic is well known by author.

• The figures are well referenced and understandable.
• References must be organized so that it can link the note with the reference at the bottom. That is corrected by following the instructions in the following link [1]