Feedback by Lasse Madsen

I will review the article as it is now. It seems like it is not completely done :-) Keep up the good spirit!

Formal aspects

The grammatical and spelling in the article is very fine, however some sentences can become a bit long, where I miss some "," or division into paragraphs. An example is: "Communication covers both the top down communication from management and the communication between the project leaders and the project team members about the tasks of the team member." from the section: Communication.
I miss references to the figures in the text. And also the context of the figures.
It seems like the author has made the figures him/herself which is positive. It makes sure that there is no conflicting copyrights.
Overall structure i miss some more WIKI formatting, ie.
- bullet points (*),
- Categories: [[Categories:Management]]
- References: [[project management]]
- Additional reading section
My suggestion will be to put the introduction before the list of content to make a read-threat
- Also to add a "readers guide" on how the article will be structured, and what the reader can expect.

The first thing that i noticed was the sources used to support the main arguments in the article. I miss academic sources, ie. looking into 'project management in volunteering organizations' from Journals, DTU Findit or Google Scholar or similar. An example could be to provide a literature review and then comparing it to the method used by the danish scouts. Then reflections and a discussion on how they could improve their methods. On a quick search i found:
- Hager, Mark A. "Volunteer management practices and retention of volunteers." (2004).
- Cuskelly, Graham, et al. "Volunteer management practices and volunteer retention: A human resource management approach." Sport Management Review 9.2 (2006): 141-163.
- Ellis, Susan J. From the top down. The executive role in volunteer program success. Energize, Inc., 5450 Wissahickon Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19144, 1996.
- Taylor, Tracy, et al. "Using psychological contract theory to explore issues in effective volunteer management." European Sport Management Quarterly 6.2 (2006): 123-147.
I seem to miss a direct link between the article content and the course. Maybe you could include it in the introduction.
I seem to miss the point where i as a practitioner could actually use this method or example in relation to my PPP practice. Maybe you could elaborate on this or give an example on how this could be used in a PPPM context.
Generelly I miss some more references.

is this a general approach/structure within volunteering management, or is it only from the scout community? Maybe compare with literature.

I actually do not understand what the patrol system is by reading this section. Could you be more specific? Can it be visualized? Is there a figure?
Maybe make a list of pros and cons (table or something) to make it more clear ie.

== Peer Review ==

First of all I find the idea and the topic of the article very interesting.

FORMAL ASPECTS

I would suggest another structure of the article. I am not sure about if the article is finished or not. If it is not finish is fine but if it is finished, instead of using only one main point, maybe you could use the current subpoints (from 1.1 to 1.6) as main points.
The article has some grammatical errors that need to be reviewed (principally related to singular/plural forms) e.g.: a study were done, though the study were done, specifically on group pitfalls of management within in volunteering project groups is... and also some small spelling mistakes. I suggest to copy/paste it in word in order to correct them easier.
I think that the style of the article is good, nevertheless sometimes I find short sentences alone thoughtout the text. It would be better if you elaborate a bit on them or just include them in a paragraph.
There are not formal errors in the pictures or figures. Also it seems that the author does not need the copyright to use them because he/she makes them.
I miss some Wiki-features such as external links, * points, etc...
Sometimes you write in the second person, I think it is better to use always the third person in a wiki-article (section 1.4).

CONTENT ASPECTS

Sometimes I can not see the relation between the article and project management. Maybe it would be a good idea to clarify more how project management is used within volunteering organization. It would be great to find some specific tools or techniques of project management that could be apply to volunteering organisations.
I think the article is a bit short (but maybe it is not finished).
The article is coherent and the logical flow throughout the article is great.
The article seems to be free of "copy & paste" plagiarism but I am missing more academic references (e.g.: papers, publications or project management books)
Some parts of the article seem more an opinion but it would be good if you base your feelings in some references. Another option could be to include a discussion at the end in which you state your own opinion or the pros and cons of the topic. E.g.: last paragraph of 1.2.
I really like the way you relate volunteering organisations project management with typical companies. However I think you should elaborate more on this part.