Risk management strategy
“When trouble is sensed well in advance in can be easily remedied; if you wait for it to show itself any medicine will be too late because the disease will have become incurable. As the doctors say of a wasting disease, to start with it is easy to cure but difficult to diagnose; after time… it becomes easy to diagnose but difficult to cure.” (Machiavelli, 1514)
When dealing with a project, uncertainties are to be expected, whether the project is influenced by external or internal factors. If an unexpected event turns out to be harmful to the project it is in general terms considered to be a risk. A risk can be defined as the product of the probability of the risk and the impact of the risk. Should a problem be very likely to happen, but have a little or no impact on the project there is little reason in prioritizing the mitigation of the problem. For a problem having a high impact, but very low probability the need to mitigate this problem is likewise not a priority. The impact of a risk is however more severe than the probability. For instance are smaller injuries, which happen often, easier to accept than heavier injuries, which happen more seldom. The probability of a problem should however not be neglected. A common way to illustrated this is by playing a small game:
In the construction business many factors must by in order for the project to move forward. Six people are given a dice and a problem. Whenever a person rolls a 1 a problem has occurred which delays the project. Thus the probability of a problem happening is 1/6. The probability of no problem happening is:
This means that only a third of the time, the project will progress.
If there is no certain way to determine a risk’s impact or probability or multiple risks are compared without having similar impact type (e.g. comparing human casualties against monetary loss) a qualitative approach can be used, where the risk is rated from e.g. 1-5. In this way a prioritized list of risks can be produced. With this list it is possible to determine which risk to take care of first.
This article will examine ways to identify potential risks, rate their associated probabilities and impacts and process the new knowledge.
Contents |
Risk identification
During the risk identification, a project is scrutinized for potential risks. During the scrutinisation experience is a good asset when determining the potential risks, but other methods do however exists. Risk identification is the simplest of the risk management steps, since it only requires the project group to think of possible threads and opportunities. Risk identification is however the most important step and should be repeated iterativly during the project lifetime to ensure the safety of the project.
Identification methods
Instead of relying on experience and common sense, when determining the possible risks, taxonomy-facilitated brainstorming <ref>1<ref> could be used. Brainstorming techniques includes:
- Check-lists
- What-if analysis
- Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)
- Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP)
These exercises should help the brainstorming and thought processes to identify risks.
Example:
Risk analysis
Methods for analyzing risks for further processing.
Risk assessment
Methods to assess identified risks.
Risk processing
Methods for mitigating an identified risk
When the risks have been determined and assessed, it will be natural to determine what to do. Below is a list of responses and possible solutions to use depending on the probability and impact of the risk.
Accepting the risk
Whether the risk is harmful or not, if the probability is low there is no need for doing anything to mitigate it. The occurrence of the event opposed to price of mitigating it will mostly be always turn out to too expensive. Should a benign risk with a high impact and high probability be determined for a project, then this too should also be accepted, since it is very likely to happen.
Mitigating the risk
Malignant risks with low impact, but a frequent occurrence should be mitigated. This is done by making contingency plans, investing in safety equipment and other actions which can lower the probability and/or impact.
Transfer the risk For malignant risks, with a low probability, but high impact, the most reasonably course would be to transfer the risk to someone else. This can be done by outsourcing the risky parts or by buying insurance in case the risk happens.
Avoid the risk
Should a risk be harmfully serious and very likely too happen, no insurance company will help. These occurrences should be avoided at all cost. This can be done in numerous ways depending on the risk. The safest way to avoid the risk is to change the part of the project which is in danger. If this is not possible, then the project should either be canceled or delayed until the risk no longer is probability or impact has lessened.
Researching/nurturing the risk
In the rare cases where a benign risk will have a major impact on a project, but not likely to happen, the risk should be further researched, leading to ways to improve the likelihood. It goes without saying that the cost of implementation should not be larger than the potential gains. If the research proved fruitful the risk should be nurtured to a more probable level.
Harmful risk - responses:
- Avoid: For high probability, high impact
- Transfer: For low probability, high impact
- Mitigate: For high probability, low impact
- Accept: For low probability, low impact
Useful risk – responses:
- Accept: For high probability, high impact
- Research: For low probability, high impact
- Accept: For high probability, low impact
- Accept: For low probability, low impact
