Talk:Feasibility Analysis

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is coherent

Language Minor errors e.g. writing "kids" instead of "kinds"

Description of the tool/theory/concept Okay, but add references to increase credibility. The abstract can be expanded

Purpose explanation Good, but can be improved:

  1. Consider explaining the structure and content of the article to align reader expectations

References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

Relevance of article Good, but consider the following:

  1. Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor etc?
  2. Try linking the topic to a project life cycle (check PMBOK)
  3. Consider linking this to creating a business case?