Talk:Crisis management

Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Tianhao Chen

Question 1 · TEXT

Quality of the summary:

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 1

The summary mainly talks about what the crisis management is and how important it is, but I think it would be better if you add a short introduction about the structure of this article in the abstract.

Question 2 · TEXT

Structure and logic of the article:

Is the argument clear?

Is there a logical flow to the article?

Does one part build upon the other?

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 2

Yes, it is very clear for the structure. It covers all the brief things in the crisis management. But there is a problem that there is only one core part(part 3). I think it would be better if you add some more chapters such as limitation, application.

Question 3 · TEXT

Grammar and style:

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 3

Very good writing

Question 4 · TEXT

Figures and tables:

Are figures and tables clear?

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 4

There is only one figure visible but with not very clear word on it. Maybe there are some problem of uploading pics because I could see there are some place missing the pics.

Question 5 · TEXT

Interest and relevance:

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 5

This article only talks about the theoretical method to do the crisis management. I think it is not that practical. If you add somethings for the application, it would be perfect.

Question 6 · TEXT

Depth of treatment:

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 6

It is a board topic. And the clear explanation on the structure and instruction of crisis management. If you can connect these stages of management with the real project, it would be super nice.

Question 7 · TEXT

Annotated bibliography:

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 7

Good enough. Nice annotated bibliography. Suitable references