Talk:Stakeholder analysis
Reviewer : Marie Bukkholm Question 1 · TEXT Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? Yes.
What would you suggest to improve? -
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear? It is hard to say very much about this, as the article is still quite short.
Is there a logical flow to the article? Yes
Does one part build upon the other? Not yet.
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? -
What would you suggest to improve? -
Question 3 · TEXT Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Yes
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? Yes
What would you suggest to improve? -
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear? No figures yet.
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? -
What would you suggest to improve? -
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? Yes
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? Yes, it is logical after reading the text.
What would you suggest to improve? Could be an idea to write about the influence of stakeholders in a project and what they mean for a project. Maybe some examples?
Question 6 · TEXT Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? Yes
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? Not yet
What would you suggest to improve? Hard to say, as the article is not finished.
Question 7 · TEXT Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? No
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? No
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? Yes
What would you suggest to improve? More references.
Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Sandro Pina Question 1 · TEXT Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1 Answer here
Question 2 · TEXT Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2 Answer here
Question 3 · TEXT Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3 Answer here
Question 4 · TEXT Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4 Answer here
Question 5 · TEXT Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5 Answer here
Question 6 · TEXT Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6 Answer here
Question 7 · TEXT Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7 Answer here
