Top-down vs bottom-up estimations
Contents |
Abstract
When starting a new project, an important task for the project manager, is the estimation process. This can both be an estimation regarding cost and time-frames. It is important to get the project off to a good start, given that success of the project depends on the estimation - both in regards to time and cost. When estimating (or in other words 'predicting the future'), the project manager can use the following methods:
- - Top-down approach
- - Bottom-up approach
By choosing the top-down approach, the project manager chooses to make an overall scope of the project. From here, the major elements of the project is being listed and estimated separately. This approach creates a rough idea of the project size and the different timeframes of the project elements. The advantages of using the top-down approach is less time consuming and requires a limited amount effort. The estimates created by this method often turns out larger than the ones, which has been found using the bottom-up approach. [1]
The bottom-up approach is on the other hand a very time-consuming and costly method, but it gives a more accurate estimate of the project time and cost. By using the bottom-up approach, the cost and time frame is being calculated for every activity related to the project. [2] The bottom-up approach is often used in order to gain stakeholders to buy in on the project.
Big idea
Text
Application
Text
Limitations
Text
Annotated Bibliography
Text
References
- ↑ https://www.apm.org.uk/blog/three-ways-to-approach-cost-estimation/
- ↑ https://pmstudycircle.com/2012/06/4-tools-to-estimate-costs-in-the-project-management/
References to use for later
Web: https://www.apm.org.uk/blog/three-ways-to-approach-cost-estimation/
Web: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/top-down-bottom-up-pm-8496
Video: https://study.com/academy/lesson/top-down-bottom-up-estimating-techniques-in-project-management.html