Choosing by Advantages Decision-Making System

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Steps)
(Summary/Abstract)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
This article aims to provide a deeper insight into the Choosing by Advantages Decision-Making System. The model described in this article is a collaborative and transparent decision making system developed by Jim Suhr in 1999.  
 
This article aims to provide a deeper insight into the Choosing by Advantages Decision-Making System. The model described in this article is a collaborative and transparent decision making system developed by Jim Suhr in 1999.  
  
The basis for the whole methodology relies on providing assistance to simplify the decision-making process. With this tool, decision-makers can reach consensus, focus on outcomes, and understand all of the factors considered during the decision-making process.[https://books.google.dk/books?id=TulbgUyU2GsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false] For instance, it is useful to apply the CBA system in situations where it is complex to have a clear visualization of the proper decision to take. It must be mentioned that decision-making often involves the decision-makers' personal interests, intuitions and emotions, which can sometimes lead to a domination of the personal interests among the rational decisions. [https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/2305335675]
+
The basis for the whole methodology relies on providing assistance to simplify the decision-making process. With this tool, decision-makers can reach consensus, focus on outcomes, and understand all of the factors considered during the decision-making process. <ref name=''[1]''> ''link/title'' </https://books.google.dk/books?id=TulbgUyU2GsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false] For instance, it is useful to apply the CBA system in situations where it is complex to have a clear visualization of the proper decision to take. It must be mentioned that decision-making often involves the decision-makers' personal interests, intuitions and emotions, which can sometimes lead to a domination of the personal interests among the rational decisions. [https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/2305335675>
  
 
In order to assess this issue, multiple tools can be used to facilitate the decision-making procedure. The main objective of this technique is to apply this type of methodology in any case that involves making an important decision. This means that it is suitable for either big or small companies, as it supports sound decision-making by using comparisons among advantages of the diverse alternatives. Furthermore, the CBA system involves a multiple step procedure that aims to facilitate the implementation of the tool. The first step involves defining the existing issues, the second one aims to identify the alternatives, the third one describes the advantages of each alternative, the fourth involves reviewing the decision and the last one consists on executing the implementation. [https://books.google.dk/books?id=TulbgUyU2GsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false] The implementation of these steps is flexible, meaning that can be removed or combined depending on the situation they are applied.  
 
In order to assess this issue, multiple tools can be used to facilitate the decision-making procedure. The main objective of this technique is to apply this type of methodology in any case that involves making an important decision. This means that it is suitable for either big or small companies, as it supports sound decision-making by using comparisons among advantages of the diverse alternatives. Furthermore, the CBA system involves a multiple step procedure that aims to facilitate the implementation of the tool. The first step involves defining the existing issues, the second one aims to identify the alternatives, the third one describes the advantages of each alternative, the fourth involves reviewing the decision and the last one consists on executing the implementation. [https://books.google.dk/books?id=TulbgUyU2GsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false] The implementation of these steps is flexible, meaning that can be removed or combined depending on the situation they are applied.  

Revision as of 17:38, 25 February 2021

by Kendra Ana Rodríguez López

Summary/Abstract

This article aims to provide a deeper insight into the Choosing by Advantages Decision-Making System. The model described in this article is a collaborative and transparent decision making system developed by Jim Suhr in 1999.

The basis for the whole methodology relies on providing assistance to simplify the decision-making process. With this tool, decision-makers can reach consensus, focus on outcomes, and understand all of the factors considered during the decision-making process. [1]


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox