Earned Value Management (EVM)

From apppm
Revision as of 10:20, 17 February 2021 by S202041 (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

cheatsheet

re-cite: [1]


Abstract

When managing projects, it is of greatest interest to make sure that the project delivers what has been agreed upon. In order to improve the odds to fulfill the expectations, performance measurment can be used. Performance measurement allows the project manager to closer monitor the project and easier decide when it is necessary to take actions, if the project is running out of line. Projects that not monitored properly run the risk of being late, overrun the budget and end up being out of scope, which often can lead to unsatisfied stakeholders. [1] Earned value management is a method used in project management to evaluate the performance of a project at any point to monitor whether the project is proceeding according to plan or not. This is done by comparing the expected outcome of the three constraints cost, time and scope. In addition earned value also evaluates what has been accomplished in the project so far.[2][3] The result of the performance measurement is a value which indicates how much the current state of the project varies from the expected progress with cost, time and scope taken into account. This value can later be used to forecast the when the project will be finished and at what cost, if it proceeds at the current pace. [4]

This article aims to explain the purpose and concepts of earned value management and how it can be applied in order to improve projects. Further, the concept will be analysed where the advantages and disadvantages of the concept will be explained. Finally, the article will discuss the limitations of the concept, what it does and does not do.

Big idea

describe the tool, concept or theory and explain its purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic

Application

provide guidance on how to use the tool, concept or theory and when it is applicable

Limitations

Critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory and its application context. What can it do, what can it not do? Under what circumstances should it be used, and when not? How does it compare to the “status quo” of the standards – is it part of it, or does it extent them? Discuss your article in the context of key readings / resources provided in class. Substantiate your claims with literature

Annotated bibliography

Provide key references (3-10), where a reader can find additional information on the subject. The article MUST make appropriate references to the and reference material provided in class – either incorporating it as a source, or critically discussing aspects that are missing from it but covered by this article. Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic (around 100 words per reference). The bibliography is not counted in the suggested 3000 word target length of the article.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Project Management Institute (2017) A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide). 6th ed. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  2. Project Management Institute (2012) Practice standards for earned value management. 2nd ed. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  3. Sparrow, H. (2002). Integrating scheduling and earned value management (EVM) metrics. Paper presented at Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, San Antonio, TX. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  4. Levine, H. A. (2005) Project portfolio management: A practical guide to selecting projects, managing portfolios, and maximizing benefits. London, England: Jossey-Bass.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox