Motivation through Theory X&Y from a Project Management perspective

From apppm
Revision as of 16:47, 13 February 2021 by S144408 (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Developed by Marie Elly Ulricke Kristensen


Contents

Abstract

In the 1950s large-scale, complex, and interdisciplinary projects emerged. Along with the new trend in project format, new materials, procedures, and methods were developed to support the success of these [1]. Thus, paving the way for projects to be more focused on the Socio-technical aspects and the importance of soft skills [1].

As projects have continued to become more complicated, this has proven the project manager's importance in leading projects to success. A project manager may have the necessary skills to guide a project team through various project stages and project life cycles, but team motivation is an essential element of a successful project [2]. Thus, making this an important leadership skill for project managers.

The idea that a manager’s attitude has an impact on employee motivation was initially suggested by Douglas Murray McGregor (1906-1964), Professor of Management at the MIT Sloan School of Management in the late 1930’s and 1940’s [3]. In 1960, McGregor released the book, The Human Side of Enterprise, which proposed two theories by which mangers perceive and address employee motivation [4]. The two antagonistic motivational methods are referred to as Theory X and Theory Y management, each of which assumes the manager’s role to focus on organising resources, including people, to best benefit the company [4]. However, beyond this commonality, the two theories split corporate thinking into two camps in their embodiment of attitudes and assumptions [3].

This article will start by introducing the relevant background to the initiation of Theory X&Y, followed by an introduction to the two different motivational methods, their theoretical framework, and how this reflects in the role of a project manager. The article will then introduce the different advantages and disadvantages of each of the motivational methods from a management perspective as well as reflect on the criticism of Theory X&Y. Lastly the article will reflect on the complex work environment in context to choosing a management style based on the motivational theories proposed by McGregor.

Background

Theory X

Sub Headline

Theory Y

Sub Headline

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Zûst, R. & Troxler, P. (2006). Communication. No More Muddling Through – Master Compelx Projects in Engineering and Management. Published by Springer Netherlands. ISBN: 978-1-4020-5018-3.
  2. Schmid, B., Adams, J. Motivation in Project Management: The Project Manager’s Perspective. [1]. Project Management Journal. Issue published: June 1, 2008. Volume: 39 issue: 2, p. 60-71.
  3. 3.0 3.1 MIT Institute for Work and Employment Research: Douglas M. McGregor. [2]. Accessed 13-02-2021.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Williams, L, Lumen Learning. Introduction to Business: Reading: McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y. [3]. Accessed 13-02-2021. License: CC BY-NC: Attribution-NonCommercial.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox