Talk:Business Case
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Feedback to first version of Wiki article) |
(→Feedback to first version of Wiki article) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Feedback to first version of Wiki article== | ==Feedback to first version of Wiki article== | ||
| + | Note: since the article only contains abstract and headings, I will focus on what is there and recommendations for reading material. :) | ||
*'''Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?''' | *'''Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?''' | ||
** | ** | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 17 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Text is coherent
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, consider elaborating the tools for making a business case mentioned in the abstract
Purpose explanation Good, but consider who your reader is - is the project manager? project sponsor?
References Good
Relevance of article Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?
Feedback to first version of Wiki article
Note: since the article only contains abstract and headings, I will focus on what is there and recommendations for reading material. :)
- Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
- Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
- Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?
