Talk:Causal Loop Diagram
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Over all the structure of the article is very nice, many sources and it is easy to read. You have described the topic very well in a very understandable way. The litteratur yo...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Over all the structure of the article is very nice, many sources and it is easy to read. You have described the topic very well in a very understandable way. | Over all the structure of the article is very nice, many sources and it is easy to read. You have described the topic very well in a very understandable way. | ||
| − | The litteratur you have used, is very reliable and trustworthy. | + | The litteratur you have used, is very reliable and trustworthy. I miss references for the loop diagrams. |
| + | |||
'''Feedback on grammatical- and punctuation errors''' | '''Feedback on grammatical- and punctuation errors''' | ||
I myself am not an expert in English, I could not give you feedback on grammatical and punctuation errors, but your article is written in a very understandable and simple language. | I myself am not an expert in English, I could not give you feedback on grammatical and punctuation errors, but your article is written in a very understandable and simple language. | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 25 November 2014
Over all the structure of the article is very nice, many sources and it is easy to read. You have described the topic very well in a very understandable way. The litteratur you have used, is very reliable and trustworthy. I miss references for the loop diagrams.
Feedback on grammatical- and punctuation errors
I myself am not an expert in English, I could not give you feedback on grammatical and punctuation errors, but your article is written in a very understandable and simple language.
