Talk:Choosing by Advantages (CBA)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent, but could flow more '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to fol...") |
(→Abstract Feedback) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Purpose explanation''' What purpose does this article serve in project/project/program management context? E.g. deciding on approving or rejecting a project business case? | '''Purpose explanation''' What purpose does this article serve in project/project/program management context? E.g. deciding on approving or rejecting a project business case? | ||
| − | '''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references | + | '''References''' Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references. Avoid referencing blogs |
'''Relevance of article''' Consider the following: | '''Relevance of article''' Consider the following: | ||
Revision as of 00:19, 14 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Text is coherent, but could flow more
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project/project/program management rather than just organizational management or day-to-day decision making at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract
Purpose explanation What purpose does this article serve in project/project/program management context? E.g. deciding on approving or rejecting a project business case?
References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references. Avoid referencing blogs
Relevance of article Consider the following:
- Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor ect? And how will they benefit from reading it?
- What kind of issues can be tackled using this aproach?
- Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
