Talk:Critical reflection on Project Portfolio Management software

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Val review)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Val review ==
 
== Val review ==
  
*
+
 
 +
 
 +
===Content aspects===
 +
 
 +
*"Even though Cooper R. argues that poor tools are better than no tools I would argue that a tool that distorts the result is worse."?
 +
*"From 1990 - 1999 IT investments rose from 9% - 22%" % of what?
 +
*Conclusion?
 +
 
 +
===Formal aspects===
 +
 
 +
*use of references
 +
*figure 1 is missing
 +
*hard to see the legend/caption in figure 2
 +
*"Executives" or "executives? You should choose one of the writting
 +
 
 +
===Grammar and Spelling===
 +
*deferral instead of deferal
 +
*" As Lee Merkhofer consulting states. It is not beneficial for software developers to make advanced PPM software targeting niche markets."?
 +
*"The bottom line is that even though PPM decision making software is adapted by many companies it fail"s" to gain user acceptance."

Revision as of 17:08, 25 November 2014

Contents

Val review

Content aspects

  • "Even though Cooper R. argues that poor tools are better than no tools I would argue that a tool that distorts the result is worse."?
  • "From 1990 - 1999 IT investments rose from 9% - 22%" % of what?
  • Conclusion?

Formal aspects

  • use of references
  • figure 1 is missing
  • hard to see the legend/caption in figure 2
  • "Executives" or "executives? You should choose one of the writting

Grammar and Spelling

  • deferral instead of deferal
  • " As Lee Merkhofer consulting states. It is not beneficial for software developers to make advanced PPM software targeting niche markets."?
  • "The bottom line is that even though PPM decision making software is adapted by many companies it fail"s" to gain user acceptance."
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox