Talk:DICE Framework
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Maybe the "four elements" and "application" could be presented the other way round? In my mind it makes more sense to first present the elements and then the use of the tool. ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Maybe the "four elements" and "application" could be presented the other way round? In my mind it makes more sense to first present the elements and then the use of the tool. Unless you have it somehow different in your mind which is also ok of course. | Maybe the "four elements" and "application" could be presented the other way round? In my mind it makes more sense to first present the elements and then the use of the tool. Unless you have it somehow different in your mind which is also ok of course. | ||
| − | + | Are there any similar tools? How is this one better? For what cases it's better and for which cases not? These questions would be interesting for me to discuss upon. | |
| + | |||
| + | Also, if you can find any cases of companies that used it and present them it would be nice as well, it would indicate the use and benefits more clearly. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:34, 19 September 2017
Maybe the "four elements" and "application" could be presented the other way round? In my mind it makes more sense to first present the elements and then the use of the tool. Unless you have it somehow different in your mind which is also ok of course.
Are there any similar tools? How is this one better? For what cases it's better and for which cases not? These questions would be interesting for me to discuss upon.
Also, if you can find any cases of companies that used it and present them it would be nice as well, it would indicate the use and benefits more clearly.
