Talk:Financial appraisal of project proposals
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
===Answer 1=== | ===Answer 1=== | ||
| − | |||
Yes, nothing. | Yes, nothing. | ||
| Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
===Answer 2=== | ===Answer 2=== | ||
| − | |||
Yes, Yes the flow is very logical. Yes and yes. | Yes, Yes the flow is very logical. Yes and yes. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 59: | ||
===Answer 3=== | ===Answer 3=== | ||
| − | |||
I haven't spot any errors and I believe that its pretty precise. I don't believe there is much room for improvement. | I haven't spot any errors and I believe that its pretty precise. I don't believe there is much room for improvement. | ||
| Line 74: | Line 71: | ||
===Answer 4=== | ===Answer 4=== | ||
| − | |||
Yes, Yes, the figures give a ver good insight on what the article will handle and what are the relationships between different sections. | Yes, Yes, the figures give a ver good insight on what the article will handle and what are the relationships between different sections. | ||
Nothing to improve | Nothing to improve | ||
| Line 88: | Line 84: | ||
===Answer 5=== | ===Answer 5=== | ||
| − | |||
I believe it is relevant, especially for our group project. | I believe it is relevant, especially for our group project. | ||
Yes, it is made in the abstract. | Yes, it is made in the abstract. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 98: | ||
===Answer 6=== | ===Answer 6=== | ||
| − | |||
Yes, yes, nothing. | Yes, yes, nothing. | ||
| Line 117: | Line 111: | ||
What would you suggest to improve? | What would you suggest to improve? | ||
===Answer 7=== | ===Answer 7=== | ||
| − | |||
Yes, yes, yes | Yes, yes, yes | ||
I think you should try to add some references to the compulsory readings. | I think you should try to add some references to the compulsory readings. | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 18 February 2018
Contents |
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Coherent
Language Good, with some minor errors e.g. write "to evaluate" instead of "to evaluates." Re-read the abstract
Description of the tool/theory/concept Easy to follow, but the image is too small to read. In most cases, I would personally recommend to not use diagrams in abstracts, but rather move them to a "background" section where the tool is more thoroughly explained
Purpose explanation Good, but consider:
- Is this tool primarily applied for portfolio or program management?
- Who is the reader? Project or Program manager or any project team member?
References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references
Relevance of article It is relevant. Consider the following:
- Try to link it to a knowledge area of project/program/portfolio management
- Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project/program/portfolio management community more than a normal web search
Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Piotr
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary: Good
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
Yes, nothing.
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
Yes, Yes the flow is very logical. Yes and yes.
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
I haven't spot any errors and I believe that its pretty precise. I don't believe there is much room for improvement.
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
Yes, Yes, the figures give a ver good insight on what the article will handle and what are the relationships between different sections. Nothing to improve
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
I believe it is relevant, especially for our group project. Yes, it is made in the abstract. Nothing
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
Yes, yes, nothing.
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
Yes, yes, yes I think you should try to add some references to the compulsory readings.
Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
Answer here
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
Answer here
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
Answer here
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
Answer here
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
Answer here
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
Answer here
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
Answer here
