Talk:Group Dynamics and Personality Types

Review by joh

Review of the content

General comment: The academic level and quality of the content, seems to me to be quite good. I understand what the article is describing about group dynamics and personality types - it goes quite good through what the terms mean, and in which context they are relevant. It seems relevant especially for project management. If nothing else mentioned here in my review, then it is safe to assume I don’t have a comment or I think it’s fine.

• Though I seem to miss a clear link between these two elements. Because I know how to find right personalities and I know how a group dynamic should be, but how would I know to put which personality into a group to give a certain dynamic?
• If possible, more visual illustrations might good especially in the group sections, because the text now seems quite dense.
• I guess a summary/abstract and a discussion is to come?

Review of formal aspects

The article is really taken shape in a good way, though it still looks like work in progress. But keep up the good work!

• In section introduction: behaviour -> behavior
• In section introduction: Sentence: their expertise, but on behalf of the individual profiles and behaviour. -> their expertise, but also on behalf of the individual profiles and behaviour.
• In section introduction: Sentence: Furthermore will this it explain the different personality types based on the theory -> Furthermore this will explain the different personality types based on the theory
• In section introduction: Senctence: To manage temporary project groups effectively, is it important to understand the group members, the behaviour, how group are developing and how the members are interacting with each other. -> ?? (I’m a little unclear on what this sentence is suppose to say)
• In section introduction: missing reference to Carl Jung and Myers Briggs in the bottom.
• In section Groups and Group Processes: organisation -> organization. (Do you use UK or US English, I would recommend stiking to the one or the other? Because in other place I’ve seen you spell organize, with a z.)
• In section Groups and Group Processes: sentence: the communication between the group members, as they interact in seeking to find a solution -> the communication between the group members, as they interact in seeking an solution (removing three words, and adding one)
• In section Group Dynamics: behaviour -> behavior
• In section Group Dynamics: sentence: This article is therefore explaining the development of a group on behalf Tuckmans theory, and clarify -> This article is therefore explaining the development of a group on behalf Tuckmans theory, and clarifies
• In section Group Development: behaviour -> behavior
• In section Group Development: Model: missing model caption
• In section Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – MBTI: organisation -> organization
• In section Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – MBTI: analysing -> analyzing
• In section Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – MBTI: connestions -> connections
• In section Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – MBTI: tp -> to
• In section Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – MBTI: 4 letter -> four letter
• In section the 16 MBTI types: behaviour -> behavior
• In section the 16 MBTI types: sentence: The table below are reflecting -> The table below is reflecting
• In section the 16 MBTI types: in table: Counsellor -> Counselor
• In section the 16 MBTI types: in table: Indipendent -> Independent
• In section the 16 MBTI types: in table: Sceptical -> Skeptical
• In section benefits of MBTI: sentence: The tool, helps people easily understand -> The tool helps people easily understand (no comma)
• In section benefits of MBTI: Career conseling -> Career counseling
• Headline of Diskussion of usability section shoud be Discussion of usability
• General: All reference should be the bottom (I guess that is to come, you have already set some reference in the test, you are only missing to specify “<reference/>” in the bottom in the section reference, and the references will afterwards appear by them selves.)
• General: Remember model/picture captions
• General: Remember all places in text that points to a figure actually point to a figure and not only X