Talk:Impact vs. Probability

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Feedback on Abstract:)
(Feedback on Abstract:)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| Is there but not clear for the reader, try to reformulate by explaining the intention of the article  
 
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| Is there but not clear for the reader, try to reformulate by explaining the intention of the article  
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Title of the Wiki'''||To broad, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article
+
|'''Title of the Wiki'''||Too broad, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''References'''|| OK
 
|'''References'''|| OK

Latest revision as of 15:46, 18 September 2017

[edit] Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity The text sounds coherent and it builds on references
Language OK with minor misspellings
Description of the tool/theory/concept OK
Purpose explanation Is there but not clear for the reader, try to reformulate by explaining the intention of the article
Title of the Wiki Too broad, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article
References OK

[edit] Other

"In risk analysis, risk is traditionally defined as a function of probability and impact" Missing reference?

"By combining the probability and impact, the Level of Risk can be determined." Missing reference? who says that or is your own assessment.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox