Talk:Kaizen Event - a managerial tool for problem-solving
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Review by Nemo) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Introduction=== | ===Introduction=== | ||
| − | *What are the 5 basic lean principles that you mention? It would be nice to mention them. | + | *What are the 5 basic lean principles that you mention? It would be nice to mention them. Or maybe you do so in Table 1? But then please refer to Table 1. |
*It should be considered to have the section "Kaizen Event definition" before "Kaizen vs. Kaizen Events in Lean thinking". | *It should be considered to have the section "Kaizen Event definition" before "Kaizen vs. Kaizen Events in Lean thinking". | ||
*"Arrow diagram" - is that a gantt chart? | *"Arrow diagram" - is that a gantt chart? | ||
*To some degree I see the subsection as separate. Flow in the article and transition between subsections can be optimised. This can typically be done with 1-2 lines text in the end of each subsection focusing on the transition to the next subsection. | *To some degree I see the subsection as separate. Flow in the article and transition between subsections can be optimised. This can typically be done with 1-2 lines text in the end of each subsection focusing on the transition to the next subsection. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Overview of Kaizen Event=== | ||
| + | *"Three- to five-day concentrated work session" - you mentioned a week in the introduction. | ||
| + | *It is unclear for me who is attending a Kaizen Event - employees or management? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Guide for a Kaizen Event process=== | ||
| + | *Nice with an example. To be hornest - at this point in the article I start to understand what it all about. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Sum up of factors to consider during the Kaizen Event process=== | ||
| + | *I like this section. But maybe the title should just be "Conclusion". It is not necessarily something that should be considered during the KE process. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Benefits & Challenges=== | ||
| + | *Fine section :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===References=== | ||
| + | *Looks like proper references in general. | ||
| + | *You are not 100% consequent about how you are writing your references. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===GENERAL=== | ||
| + | *It looks good but be carefull that there are a clear and harmonious line through the article. | ||
| + | *You could consider having a section in the end of the article about similar/other tools. | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 25 November 2014
Contents |
Review by Nemo
Layout and Wiki-issues
- Layout looks good in general.
- You are using the Wiki functions for keywords and references very nice.
- When doing numbered bullet points I can recommend that you use "#" instead of "*"
- You have some errors with missing references, that are highlighted with red in the text. It looks like you are already working on this.
- You link to some sides that does not exist fx. "Kaizen" and "Kaizen Events".
- You are doing some quotes, which are very nice in general. I can recommend the function <blockquote> xxx </blockquote>
Abstract
- The abstract assumes that the reader knows what Kaizen Event is about. At this stage I did had never heard about it. For me it would have been nice that the concept was shortly introduced in the abstract.
- Why is it limited to project management - what about programme and portfolio?
- The keywords make sence:)
Introduction
- What are the 5 basic lean principles that you mention? It would be nice to mention them. Or maybe you do so in Table 1? But then please refer to Table 1.
- It should be considered to have the section "Kaizen Event definition" before "Kaizen vs. Kaizen Events in Lean thinking".
- "Arrow diagram" - is that a gantt chart?
- To some degree I see the subsection as separate. Flow in the article and transition between subsections can be optimised. This can typically be done with 1-2 lines text in the end of each subsection focusing on the transition to the next subsection.
Overview of Kaizen Event
- "Three- to five-day concentrated work session" - you mentioned a week in the introduction.
- It is unclear for me who is attending a Kaizen Event - employees or management?
Guide for a Kaizen Event process
- Nice with an example. To be hornest - at this point in the article I start to understand what it all about.
Sum up of factors to consider during the Kaizen Event process
- I like this section. But maybe the title should just be "Conclusion". It is not necessarily something that should be considered during the KE process.
Benefits & Challenges
- Fine section :)
References
- Looks like proper references in general.
- You are not 100% consequent about how you are writing your references.
GENERAL
- It looks good but be carefull that there are a clear and harmonious line through the article.
- You could consider having a section in the end of the article about similar/other tools.
