Talk:Lean Project Management

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Content aspects)
(Formal aspects)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
= Formal aspects =
 
= Formal aspects =
*The language nice and easy to understand but proof-reading is recommended.
+
*The language is nice and easy to understand but proof-reading is recommended.
 
*The structure of the article engages the reader. It is well structured and chronologically written.
 
*The structure of the article engages the reader. It is well structured and chronologically written.
 
*The use of figures is great and supports the take-away points from the sections.  
 
*The use of figures is great and supports the take-away points from the sections.  
Line 12: Line 12:
 
*It is assumed that the author has created the figures by him/her-self and that there are no copyright issues.  
 
*It is assumed that the author has created the figures by him/her-self and that there are no copyright issues.  
 
*The article is very well formatted Wiki-style.  
 
*The article is very well formatted Wiki-style.  
*References are used consistently and correct and seem to cover the topic to a great extent.  
+
*References are used consistently and correct and seem to cover the topic to a great extent.
  
 
= Content aspects =
 
= Content aspects =

Revision as of 02:08, 26 November 2014

Feedbck on "Lean Project Management" by DBDHL

This is a great, well written article providing a solid description of Lean Project Management.

Formal aspects

  • The language is nice and easy to understand but proof-reading is recommended.
  • The structure of the article engages the reader. It is well structured and chronologically written.
  • The use of figures is great and supports the take-away points from the sections.
  • The figures seem correct, convincing and easy to understand.
  • I suggest adding figure numbers in the figure texts.
  • I suggest referring to the figures throughout the text. This hasn’t been done consistently.
  • It is assumed that the author has created the figures by him/her-self and that there are no copyright issues.
  • The article is very well formatted Wiki-style.
  • References are used consistently and correct and seem to cover the topic to a great extent.

Content aspects

  • It’s great the article starts by explaining the importance of the topic: Lean project management. This is engaging the reader and works as a great appetizer to read more.
  • Consider to include some of the findings from the article so it works as a summary.
  • The topic is assumed to be highly relevant for a practitioner considering to apply Lean project Management within an organization.
  • It is clear that the article belongs to the “Introduction and overview” category since it takes care of the proposed elements.
  • The length of the article seems appropriate. The article seems to cover the topic to a great extent without being too “heavy” to read.
  • There is a great chronological red thread throughout the article as well as a nice overview.
  • References are in general used extensively with relevant sources of high quality.
  • The article has a section referring to other Wiki pages, which is great.
  • It can be a but difficult to distinct between own opinion and statements from literature:
    • From the top section: Using “our” in the following sentence makes it seem like it is written by a company and is a bit confusing: “Competition in our industry increasingly makes more important the desire of optimizing what leads to provide our customers better service or product…”
    • From the discussion: “LPM philosophy would become an important part of the companies’ culture because they would see the long-term benefits of applying LPM tools and techniques” – where does this statement come from?
  • The article doesn’t seem to have “copy/paste” plagiarism.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox