Talk:Lean construction
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→REVIEW by Liclawio: new section) |
(→REVIEW by Liclawio) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== REVIEW by Liclawio == | == REVIEW by Liclawio == | ||
| − | + | * In general, a very nice setup of wikipage. Seems like proper use of the wiki platform. | |
| + | * Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter | ||
| + | * Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time. | ||
| + | * Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article. | ||
| + | * In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables | ||
| + | ** Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US | ||
| + | ** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings). | ||
| + | * Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected. | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 25 November 2014
REVIEW by Liclawio
- In general, a very nice setup of wikipage. Seems like proper use of the wiki platform.
- Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter
- Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time.
- Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article.
- In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables
- Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US
- Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).
- Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.
