Talk:Managing Successful Programmes (MSP)

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Good

Language Minor errors e.g. " To achieve this, the he main idea is to sub-divide..." - remove "he"?

Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, but consider going back to basics. Define what program management is and reference standards/mandatory list of references to add credibility. Also, is it true that all organizations need good program management? Also, what defines a successful program?

Purpose explanation Good and sets up the reader's expectations well

References Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

Relevance of article Consider the following:

1. Who is the reader? Program Manager etc?
2. What will the reader get out of this?
3. Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the program management community more than a normal web search