Talk:Managing Uncertainty and Risk on the Project

From apppm
Revision as of 19:12, 22 September 2015 by Andkamp (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Review1, Buurbuur: - I found the topic very interesting and very relevant for this course. - Good that many point are illustrated with an appropriate figure. - However I find the scope very broad, maybe choose only to focus on project or portofolio management. - In the definition section i find it difficult to understand and navigate between all the different definitions, maybe it could make it more easy and understandable if you make a grid to show the difference. Or list them up on bulletspoints - Secure that the article fit to one of the two article types i relation to the required topics - However I find the figures clear and understandable - Good that there are references on every figure


Anna: It is an interesting and very relevant topic, however, I would suggest that you try to narrow down the scope and focus your article on one method/tool that can be applied for managing uncertainty and risk in a project. Remember that your article has to fit one of the two article types and the required structure :)

Reviewer 3:Andkamp

  • Great use of English and nice sentences structure
  • Great subject but, very broad, needs to be narrowed a little bit
  • Nice figures, but the matrix with the papers is something I expected to be illustrated in matrix and not a Figure, in order to maintain the wiki style of the article.
  • Nice Referencing of the figures, although it hadn't any inter-wiki links or in text links.
  • The interest of a practitioner could be greater if there was more focusing in aspects of this subject.
  • Profound relation with project management
  • The good structure assures logical flow
  • Extremely poor reference material for such extended article, that could lead someone with bad intensions to think that there's some amount of plagiarism
  • Expected to see pros/cons
  • Implementations would narrow the whole subject and make it more interesting

Generally speaking a more wiki style text, with hyperlinks,more bibliography and see also section would be more appropriate to this great text.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox