Talk:Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Username : Michaelnguyendtu Review 1: Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands yo...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Username : Michaelnguyendtu | + | Username : Michaelnguyendtu <br> |
| − | Review 1: | + | Review 1: <br> |
Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands you still need the last details as literature, references, figures and layout to make it complete. Good work! | Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands you still need the last details as literature, references, figures and layout to make it complete. Good work! | ||
Formal aspects | Formal aspects | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 22 September 2015
Username : Michaelnguyendtu
Review 1:
Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands you still need the last details as literature, references, figures and layout to make it complete. Good work!
Formal aspects
- The article has an overall good academically sound to it, which makes it pleasant to read!
- Short and precise sentences which makes the article easy to read. Grammar in the article is also very neat!
- The structure is at this point good; however sub headlines in the final version would make it easier to navigate.
- For the layout in the chapter: Goals of Portfolio Management, it would maybe be “easier for the eye” to look at by using line break between the numbers 1-5.
- As this is a draft I am sure that the final version would have figures to illustrate some of the point, if not this could be a consideration.
- Annotated bibliography is at this point missing as you have also stated, important also to remember to attach some description to these.
Content
- The article is less than the required amount of words which makes room for more if you feel something is still missing.
- The “Scope definition” could maybe have a more concrete description what the article exactly is to “discover”?
