Talk:Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations

Username : Michaelnguyendtu
Review 1:

Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands you still need the last details as literature, references, figures and layout to make it complete. Good work! Formal aspects

• The article has an overall good academically sound to it, which makes it pleasant to read!
• Short and precise sentences which makes the article easy to read. Grammar in the article is also very neat!
• The structure is at this point good; however sub headlines in the final version would make it easier to navigate.
• For the layout in the chapter: Goals of Portfolio Management, it would maybe be “easier for the eye” to look at by using line break between the numbers 1-5.
• As this is a draft I am sure that the final version would have figures to illustrate some of the point, if not this could be a consideration.
• Annotated bibliography is at this point missing as you have also stated, important also to remember to attach some description to these.

Content

• The article is less than the required amount of words which makes room for more if you feel something is still missing.
• The “Scope definition” could maybe have a more concrete description what the article exactly is to “discover”?

Group 10: Marazaki Ilektra s142899 Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations Aikaterini Smaro Tsolaki s141592

To begin with,in general this article is very clear and every one can understand the purpose of the article without knowing much about Portfolio Management. Formal aspects:

   • This article is free of grammatical errors or spelling errors.
   • The most of the sentences are very clear but some of them should be shorter instead of long winded.
   • By reading this you can understand the meaning of the article.
   • The article is written formal and it follows the wiki standards.

Content aspects:

   • I do not think that it is an article is helpful for practitioner because it describes Portfolio Management from a very general view.
   • The size of the article is perfect,not too long or too short.Everyone can read it without being board or not understanding.
   • Most of the parts are pretty tied together and you can notice the escalation of the parts very clear.
   • The summary contains the most of the parts that you will meat in the article.
   • The article also provides many sources and several studies and practical cases.
   • The article does not contain bibliography.
   • I do not think that the article seems to be copy and paste because by reading it you can notice the authors mentality.