Talk:Prefabricated houses (industrial process)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Ok. Could be more coherent |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Although you have a description of...") |
(→Feedback on Abstract:) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{| | {| | ||
| − | |'''Text clarity & language'''|| | + | |'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is ok but it to be more coherent in some parts, specially in the "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Although you have a description of a prefabricated house process, there is no clear description of what tool/theory/concept you want to analyse | + | |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Although you have a description of a prefabricated house process, there is no clear description of what tool/theory/concept you want to describe/analyse |
|- | |- | ||
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated. Although you have a context/industry background, the purpose of the article is not explicit | |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated. Although you have a context/industry background, the purpose of the article is not explicit | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|'''References'''|| Missing references (the one you have in the abstract are not at the right place). Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references | |'''References'''|| Missing references (the one you have in the abstract are not at the right place). Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |'''Others'''|| I assumed that your abstract was the "Summary" and "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" headings. The abstract should be a summary of your article and should have a clear description of the tool/theory/concept you want to analyse and the explanation of the article's purpose. In this kind of article, making references to the lectures might not be relevant since people from outside the class can also read it. You might also consider to write the abstract all together under a heading called "Abstract" to make it easier to read. The title should give a better idea/understanding of the tool/theory/concept related to project, program or portfolio management that you want to analyse. | + | |'''Others'''|| I assumed that your abstract was under the "Summary" and "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" headings. The abstract should be a summary of your article and should have a clear description of the tool/theory/concept you want to analyse and the explanation of the article's purpose. In this kind of article, making references to the lectures might not be as relevant since people from outside the class can also read it. You might also consider to write the abstract all together under a heading called "Abstract" to make it easier to read. The title should also give a better idea/understanding of the tool/theory/concept related to project, program or portfolio management that you want to analyse. |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 19 February 2019
Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity & language | The text is ok but it to be more coherent in some parts, specially in the "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | Although you have a description of a prefabricated house process, there is no clear description of what tool/theory/concept you want to describe/analyse |
| Article purpose explanation | Needs to elaborated. Although you have a context/industry background, the purpose of the article is not explicit |
| Relevance to curriculum | Make sure you choose a tool/theory/concept that is relevant to project, program or portfolio management and try to define a specific focus to do an in-depth analysis throughout the article |
| References | Missing references (the one you have in the abstract are not at the right place). Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references |
| Others | I assumed that your abstract was under the "Summary" and "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" headings. The abstract should be a summary of your article and should have a clear description of the tool/theory/concept you want to analyse and the explanation of the article's purpose. In this kind of article, making references to the lectures might not be as relevant since people from outside the class can also read it. You might also consider to write the abstract all together under a heading called "Abstract" to make it easier to read. The title should also give a better idea/understanding of the tool/theory/concept related to project, program or portfolio management that you want to analyse. |
