Talk:Prefabricated houses (industrial process)

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity & language	Ok. Could be more coherent
Description of the tool/theory/concept	Although you have a description of a prefabricated house process, there is no clear description of what tool/theory/concept you want to analyse
Article purpose explanation	Needs to elaborated. Although you have a context/industry background, the purpose of the article is not explicit
Relevance to curriculum	Make sure you choose a tool/theory/concept that is relevant to project, program or portfolio management and try to define a specific focus to do an in-depth analysis throughout the article
References	Missing references (the one you have in the abstract are not at the right place). Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
Others	I assumed that your abstract was the "Summary" and "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" headings. The abstract should be a summary of your article and should have a clear description of the tool/theory/concept you want to analyse and the explanation of the article's purpose. In this kind of article, making references to the lectures might not be relevant since people from outside the class can also read it. You might also consider to write the abstract all together under a heading called "Abstract" to make it easier to read. The title should give a better idea/understanding of the tool/theory/concept related to project, program or portfolio management that you want to analyse.