Talk:Product family master plan
(→Feedback on Abstract:) |
(→Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Dilan Casablanca) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
'''Quality of the summary:''' | '''Quality of the summary:''' | ||
| − | Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear | + | Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
===Answer 1=== | ===Answer 1=== | ||
| − | + | The summary is really clear because it shows with few words the main purpose of the article. After reading the summary is possible to understand quickly all the contents that are explained in the article. | |
| + | |||
| + | I suggest to show more references and to include pictures as well. | ||
===Question 2 · TEXT=== | ===Question 2 · TEXT=== | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 25 February 2019
Contents |
Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity & language | The text is coherent. |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | Good. |
| Article purpose explanation | Missing. Ensure this is emphasized and eventually highlighting the target audience. |
| Relevance to curriculum | Relevant. However, always ensure this is kept within the realms of project/program/portfolio management. |
| References | Add some of the listed references in your abstract, if it makes sense to do so. |
Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Dilan Casablanca
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
Answer 1
The summary is really clear because it shows with few words the main purpose of the article. After reading the summary is possible to understand quickly all the contents that are explained in the article.
I suggest to show more references and to include pictures as well.
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
Answer here
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
Answer here
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
Answer here
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
Answer here
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
Answer here
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
Answer here
