Talk:Project Management Body of Knowledge
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''BACKGROUND''' | '''BACKGROUND''' | ||
| + | |||
"This article will be about..." Does "be about" mean a general talk or is it more specific? Another way of phrasing it could be something like "provide the reader with a “table of contents” level understanding and starting point for in-depth exploration". I know, this is taken directly from Josef and Christians "templates and instructions" but something that tells the reader what he or she can expect to gain from reading the article. | "This article will be about..." Does "be about" mean a general talk or is it more specific? Another way of phrasing it could be something like "provide the reader with a “table of contents” level understanding and starting point for in-depth exploration". I know, this is taken directly from Josef and Christians "templates and instructions" but something that tells the reader what he or she can expect to gain from reading the article. | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 25 November 2014
Review done by Dunseiz
GENERAL COMMENTS
In general I like this article for its conciseness.
The references are done manually as far as I can see. I have made the first two "linked" reference for you because they are slightly different in the code you have to use. They can be copied/pasted and modified to fit the rest of the references.
There are a few grammatical mistakes mainly related to present tense verbs (he/she/it does VS. we/they do as well as he/she/it walks or we/they walk)
BACKGROUND
"This article will be about..." Does "be about" mean a general talk or is it more specific? Another way of phrasing it could be something like "provide the reader with a “table of contents” level understanding and starting point for in-depth exploration". I know, this is taken directly from Josef and Christians "templates and instructions" but something that tells the reader what he or she can expect to gain from reading the article.
TABLE 1
It says "table 1 below..." and I, as a reader, am not in doubt what table to look after but I would still provide the table with a figure text saying "Table 1" - just to uphold standard formatting.
I see that the numbering starts at 4 - is that on purpose or is that a mistake?
