Talk:Projects in Controlled Environments, a process-based approach for project management
(Created page with "Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Nice to see that you are already a long way with your article. I feel that maybe you should limit what you want to tell in the article and thereb...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Nice to see that you are already a long way with your article. I feel that maybe you should limit what you want to tell in the article and thereby make the article more concrete. Keep an overview of the structure and remember the structure of a "method article". | Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Nice to see that you are already a long way with your article. I feel that maybe you should limit what you want to tell in the article and thereby make the article more concrete. Keep an overview of the structure and remember the structure of a "method article". | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewer 1 (s141573): | ||
| + | I think the overall article presents a good the structure, detailed explanation and covers all the aspects to be taken into account. | ||
| + | However sometimes it seems disconnected with the project management context. | ||
| + | I found hard to understand what’s the role of this model in the overall project management process. | ||
| + | In my opinion, you could add to your abstract/introduction more information about the general philosophy before to start talking about the method. | ||
| + | I’d also suggest to focus more on the connection between the model and the benefits it can deliver to a project (ch. 4 benefit – ch 5. Limitations). | ||
| + | I think this part could be the most interesting of the whole article, since it describes the applications of the model. | ||
| + | In addition, I’d suggest to check the English fluency (ex. Continued business justification) | ||
| + | Good luck with the rest of the course! | ||
Revision as of 23:14, 22 September 2015
Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Nice to see that you are already a long way with your article. I feel that maybe you should limit what you want to tell in the article and thereby make the article more concrete. Keep an overview of the structure and remember the structure of a "method article".
Reviewer 1 (s141573): I think the overall article presents a good the structure, detailed explanation and covers all the aspects to be taken into account. However sometimes it seems disconnected with the project management context. I found hard to understand what’s the role of this model in the overall project management process. In my opinion, you could add to your abstract/introduction more information about the general philosophy before to start talking about the method. I’d also suggest to focus more on the connection between the model and the benefits it can deliver to a project (ch. 4 benefit – ch 5. Limitations). I think this part could be the most interesting of the whole article, since it describes the applications of the model. In addition, I’d suggest to check the English fluency (ex. Continued business justification) Good luck with the rest of the course!
