Talk:Risk Log

From apppm
Revision as of 23:51, 19 February 2019 by Hani Mike Rae Selim (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity & language The text is good, but can be much more coherent. There's a few grammatical errors. The abstract still needs to be finalized.
Description of the tool/theory/concept This can be improved. The abstract needs to be further elaborated. Risk log is not even mentioned. It needs to be mentioned and explained.
Article purpose explanation Missing. In addition to the point above, the purpose of the article and eventual target group needs to be highlighted. The purpose should be easily understood from reading the abstract.
Relevance to curriculum Relevant.
References Add some of the listed references (on DTU Inside) in your abstract, if it makes sense to do so. Make sure to reference throughout the entire article.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox